Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex

That wasn't the subject of the verses quoted.


3,242 posted on 12/31/2006 11:30:26 AM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3229 | View Replies ]


To: Blogger; Dr. Eckleburg; P-Marlowe
wasn't the subject

Dr. Eckleburg quoted them in response to Marlowe's statement "There is no scriptural basis for the contention that Mary was born without original sin. There are plenty of verses to the contrary" (3212). Apparently Dr. Eckleburg thinks that the verses indicating that Mary had a large extended family somehow point to her sinning. These verses may be interpreted as Mary being mother of other children beside Jesus, but for the life of me I do not understand where they point to any sin in her.

3,284 posted on 01/01/2007 1:08:20 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson