No, it's an observation.
" It is your interpretation that it means only that. It is annalex's interpretation that it means more than that."
The plain language is very clear and so is the bandwagon straw.
Re: the response in no way whatsoever means she was indicating she would always be a virgin.
"That's your interpretation."
I guess reasonable discourse only applies if one agrees that Catholic doctrine is the truth. Sorry, no dice. When it doesn't stand up rationally to what is written as God's word and/or reality itself, it's not the truth. It's simply popular opinion, traditional, or otherwise.
Of course annalex could just say that his interpretation is also "an observation", and then the two of you would, once again, be even.
The plain language is very clear and so is the bandwagon straw.
Of course annalex could claim that his interpretation is very clear to him, and then once again, the two of you would be even.
I guess reasonable discourse only applies if one agrees that Catholic doctrine is the truth. Sorry, no dice. When it doesn't stand up rationally to what is written as God's word and/or reality itself, it's not the truth. It's simply popular opinion, traditional, or otherwise.
Of course annalex could say the same thing to you, replacing the word "Catholic" with the word "spunkets's", and then, once again, the two of you would be even.
Do you see how pointless this is?
-A8