Posted on 12/04/2006 7:52:47 PM PST by Pyro7480
You cherry-picked while you should prooftext. How can Blogger be clearer?
Transcend, physics, metaphysics, reductionism, objective reality and so on have specific meanings in these areas.
The logical operations that where used to produce the conclusion require machinery to support both the operations and the consciousness of conclusion. That is the objective reality.
No, I'm sorry, that's not objective reality as the term is properly used. I'm sorry, I don't see how to continue a discussion. It would take forever to define terms anew.
best regards and may God bless...
FK: You just happened to hit all the right buttons on one of my favorite subjects. :)
Isn't calling something a free gift an oxymoron?
Not only does it teach against presumption, but its says "For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted."
Cherry-picking- taking one verse or a set of verses out of its context to try to prove a point.
Proof-texting- using the whole counsel of Scripture to support one's point.
There is a difference.
With all due respect to Bishop Elias Minatios, his view is not grounded in scripture. You cannot become a "vessel of dishonor". God made all the vessels, some for honor and some for dishonor. What Bishop Minatios is trying to say is that you can overrule what God has designed.
But from other scripture we know, -- He is basing His election of the works of man.
Oh, brother. What heresy!!! God now base His salvation on how well someone lives their life. Well, throw out grace and mercy, we certainly don't need that!!!
Personally I would rethink this doctrine.
You correctly describe the fact that our salvation comes form Christ alone, but you incorrectly assume that works are mere evidence or product of faith. In fact, the scripture teaches that there is a two-way relationship between faith and works. This is why Romans 2, James 2, and Apocalypse 22 plainly state that were are saved by our works, and the process is described in Matthew 25.
What your cherryproofs show is that "the good works [...] meant for any other reason than our love of Jesus [...] are not acceptable". No argument there. They do not show that works in turn produce faith. How could they? It is St. Paul who likened the Christian life to a race and a battle, who declared love the greatest virtue for us to "put on". The Protestant notion of salvation preceding sanctification is counterscriptural -- it contradicts Matthew 25, 2 Peter 1, Romans 2:1-8, the parable of the rich young man who received a direct answer to the question what saves from Christ, and the exhortations to virtue -- not to faith -- we find at the end of every Pauline epistle.
Rather than changing subjects, why don't you face the problem you have, -- that Matthew 25 described election before the foundation of the world, and judgement at the end of times by works?
Which parts of NOT OF WORKS do you not understand???????
Bishop Minatios got that form Jeremiah, the same source as St. Paul got the vessels similitude.
Well, throw out grace and mercy
Where did I do that. It is divine grace and mercy that make our works salvific.
What part of "by works a man is justified; and not by faith only" do you not understand?
Romans 11:6
And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
None of it. I understand it perfectly because I understand the whole counsel of Scripture and the harmony of Paul and James. SHOW ME YOUR FAITH without your works and I will SHOW YOU my faith By my works. Works is evidence. It is not the cause of salvation. When one claims to have faith but doesn't have works then he is not justified in that claim. When one claims to have faith and shows good works, then he is justified in that claim because true faith is a faith that will work.
Salvation is NOT OF WORKS. But it works. Capisce?
There is so much assurance in Scripture a person would have to be blind to miss it.
And that is because our assurance is built on His strength, His righteousness, His sacrifice, and not our own.
Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong." -- 2 Corinthians 12:9-10"And he (the Lord) said unto me, 'My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness.' Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.
annalex-Where did I do that. It is divine grace and mercy that make our works salvific.
Blogger and I can see the problem.
How so? The definition of a gift is that it is "free." If we pay for something, it is recompense.
And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification. Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life." -- Romans 5:15,16,18"But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.
And Paul
Gift:
1. something given voluntarily without payment in return, as to show favor toward someone, honor an occasion, or make a gesture of assistance; present.
2. the act of giving.
3. something bestowed or acquired without any particular effort by the recipient or without its being earned: Those extra points he got in the game were a total gift.
4. a special ability or capacity; natural endowment; talent: the gift of saying the right thing at the right time.
verb (used with object)
5. to present with as a gift; bestow gifts upon; endow with.
6. to present (someone) with a gift: just the thing to gift the newlyweds.
dictionary.com
That's very true. And if your waking consciousness didn't convince that you have free will then, it won't convince you now.
I can't imagine someone arguing that we don't have free will. If we don't what's the point of arguing about it?
Or is it that you can't choose not to argue about it?
The position just gets absurd fast.
Dr. E: How so? The definition of a gift is that it is "free." If we pay for something, it is recompense.
Thank you. You just confirmed that the expression 'free gift' is an oxymoron. Something to the effect of a "more perfect Union..." or "at 9 AM in the morning." A gift is a gift only if it is free, so the expression "free gift" a redundancy, suggesting that there could be a gift that is not free.
I hope you realize that the Greek original has no such expression. The word used is "charisma" (grace) in at least two of your three references. The third one doesn't even have 'charisma' or any form of a gift in it.
KJV does it again...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.