Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Culture Whores
Midwest Conservative Journal ^ | 8/05/2005 | Christopher Johnson

Posted on 08/05/2005 8:04:05 AM PDT by sionnsar

The North Jersey Herald & News recently asked four New Jersey religious leaders for their views on whether it is okay to live together before marriage.  Father Lou Scurti, a Roman Catholic priest, said:

The commitment of marriage is not meant to "test the waters" by living together. Living together is only one aspect of what the commitment entails. Knowing each other and preparing to spend a lifetime together is a lifelong experience.

When two people, two lives, from two families come together to marry, it should be after a period of learning about each other’s values, attitudes, habits, strengths and weaknesses, with the intention of longevity, mutual love and a commitment to raise children in a family that is wholesome, spiritual and responsible.

Living with each other before marriage makes it seem like a trial run which has nothing to do with the ongoing commitment that is needed in these areas of mutual trust and fidelity.

Pastor Yeathus Johnson of the Patterson Gospel Church observed:

Marriage is the biblical standard designed, instituted and ordained by God as the foundation for all families within human society (Gen. 2, 3). Marriage and sexual relations are gifts from God and regulated by God. Since human beings did not establish the institution of marriage and sexual relations, we cannot regulate them but only submit to the Creator in these matters. Hebrews 13:4 informs us to "honor marriage, and guard the sacredness of sexual intimacy between wife and husband because God will judge those who are immoral and those who commit adultery." Marriage authorizes sexual relations, not cohabitation.

The underlying premise behind cohabitation is freedom - freedom to make self-centered choices and live under the pretense of a commitment while maintaining the ease of abandoning the relationship at will. The problem with test-driving is that the law of probability favors a child being conceived through this illicit sexual union. The lack of true commitment in these pseudo-marriages leaves single parents and children at a greater risk to poverty, rejection and abandonment issues, shame, anger and deviant behavior.

Marriage is a passionate commitment of the physical, emotional/mental and spiritual. It is an act of the will, a pledge and a privilege. The basis for marital commitment is unconditional and servanthood love. "Committed love is costly and expensive but it yields the highest returns on the investment at maturity."

Mr. Mohammad El-Filali was asked for an Islamic view:

From a Muslim perspective cohabitation is not permissible at all. If a person is committed to the person, one has to live up to his responsibilities. It should not just be sex partners, it should be life partners, full commitment or no commitment.

Premarital sex is a no because not only does it affect the people who are not taking it seriously - it’s almost a non-desire to commit to someone or an institution - but it’s also sending a message to the young generation. If the family institution is going to start being diluted in such a way, the coming generation will be diluted even more and that’s not something we want to see happen. ... When we have thoughts of sexual liberation, we have concentrated on the physical and lost sight of the spiritual aspect of the sexual experience.

From Muslim perspective, the reason there are a lot of divorces is because people enter the institution of marriage for the wrong reasons. It lacks the full commitment of sacrifice and complementation between a man and wife and a desire to make it happen with compromises.

Some people are entering with total independence - the idea that the husband is independent of the wife and vice versa and there are two separate entities in household - neither one of which is going by the actual structure that God wants us to live by.

While the Rev. Ronnie Stout-Kopp replied:

I think, from the perspective of a modern female priest ... there isn’t a problem with people cohabitating or "trying it on for size," so to speak. I think the only difference comes when there are children in the relationship and, also, sometimes in some relationships, people who cohabitate always, even over the long term of five, 10, 15 years, do feel that there is always an out. There may be a lack of stability and commitment without actual marriage or blessing of the relationship.

I don’t believe that cohabitating is living in sin, I think that’s a creation of our culture, to some extent, as well as the church.

If you have to ask the denomination of the Rev. Ronnie Stout-Kopp, you really need to get out more.


TOPICS: Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 08/05/2005 8:04:05 AM PDT by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ahadams2; Fractal Trader; Zero Sum; anselmcantuar; Agrarian; coffeecup; Paridel; keilimon; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com

Humor: The Anglican Blue (by Huber)

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

2 posted on 08/05/2005 8:04:30 AM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Trad-Ang Ping: I read the dreck so you don't have to || Iran Azadi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
I think, from the perspective of a modern female priest ... there isn’t a problem with people cohabitating or "trying it on for size," so to speak.

Is this a Freudian slip from the Rev. Ronnie? Too much information?

3 posted on 08/05/2005 8:40:56 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Liberals: Too stupid to realize Dick Cheney is the real Dark Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

both. and a tragic endorsement of sin.


4 posted on 08/05/2005 9:09:01 AM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

Definitely.


5 posted on 08/05/2005 9:10:50 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Liberals: Too stupid to realize Dick Cheney is the real Dark Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
I chatted up two 30-ish women I met at a pizza parlor in NYC a few weeks ago when I was in town (I'm 37 but look late 20s, so for outward appearances we were close in age).

The prettier of the two was lamenting to (eager) her pal about how she had misgivings about a man she was beginning to date: "he was too controlling" was one of her cliches, but there were others.

I apologized for overhearing and asked if they would like my point of view. First, I asked her what made her think anyone would want to control her? Silence - she hadn't thought this through.

Thinking in cliches and bumper sticker slogans isn't good for you.

Then I asked what she valued in a relationship. Immediately she said 'independence!' Though she was very pleased with herself, I reminded her that the logical result of successfully being very independent in life is that you wind up alone.

You would think I hit her with a sock filled with quarters! ;-)
6 posted on 08/05/2005 9:14:28 AM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Is this a Freudian slip from the Rev. Ronnie? Too much information?

I take it you haven't seen her picture.


7 posted on 08/05/2005 10:15:24 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Good title..


8 posted on 08/05/2005 10:30:23 AM PDT by k2blader (Hic sunt dracones..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

I'll guess she's of the denomination that's considering a female bishop for the top spot next time. I go back to Martin Luther's phrase "the whore church of Satan" more and more lately.


9 posted on 08/05/2005 10:38:03 AM PDT by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

one reason why the embrace of Bishop Duncan, of Pittsburg, is likely to kill the ACC is that he is in love with women in the ECUSA priesthood. His second in command, in Plano,TX, has more women "handing out the host" than any church I've ever seen. Problem is they are the leaders of the "new Anglican Chruch."


10 posted on 08/05/2005 11:05:01 AM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Egad!


11 posted on 08/05/2005 11:21:36 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Liberals: Too stupid to realize Dick Cheney is the real Dark Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

If I've seen more ghastly episcopal vestments, I've blocked it out.

No comments on the rest.


12 posted on 08/05/2005 3:15:19 PM PDT by Agrarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
If you have to ask the denomination of the Rev. Ronnie Stout-Kopp, you really need to get out more.

I'm guessing there's a lot of denominations that would tolerate Rev. Ronnie.

13 posted on 08/05/2005 3:26:05 PM PDT by Lee N. Field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Agrarian
If I've seen more ghastly episcopal vestments, I've blocked it out.

Well, then, feast your eyes! This was the winner of the Nasty Chasuble contest on a late blog.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

14 posted on 08/05/2005 3:59:45 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Trad-Ang Ping: I read the dreck so you don't have to || Iran Azadi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

You know, there are some things that just ain't right... they're just plain wrong...


15 posted on 08/05/2005 10:39:58 PM PDT by Agrarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

later pingout.


16 posted on 08/05/2005 11:02:35 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

"Culture Whore" would be a great name for a blog.


17 posted on 08/06/2005 12:06:01 AM PDT by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Agrarian

Do you ever get the impression some of these guys wish they were D&D clerics?


18 posted on 08/06/2005 12:09:00 AM PDT by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage

I don't know what D & D clerics are like, since I'm unfamiliar with the game.

One thing is certain, though: these guys and gals definitely treat being priests and bishops as a role-playing/dress-up game.

They certainly don't act as though Christianity is a matter of life-and-death... which it is.


19 posted on 08/06/2005 7:10:48 AM PDT by Agrarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
"Culture Whore" would be a great name for a blog.

I was going to say "Go for it!", but then I tried http://culturewhore.blogspot.com/.

20 posted on 08/06/2005 7:56:31 AM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Trad-Ang Ping: I read the dreck so you don't have to || Iran Azadi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson