>>No, John writes in the tense of the FUTURE. <<
No, Joh writes in the past tense. "saw, sang, proclaimed, worshipped, fell". All these verbs are past tense. However, since he is describing a vision he SAW, it is reasonable to suppose that these visions are be of something yet to come. But that is a presumption, albeit a very reasonable one.
>>No, you have to chose either preterist, historicist or futurist.<<
Who says there is only one meaning? Did I not show how Isaiah had multiple meanings which have EACH been shown to be true? Surely you wouldn't argue that because Isaiah calls Cyrus the Messiah that means Jesus was not the Messiah.
>>The description of the AC in the Bible is NOT vague.<<
I'm beginning to lose patience. You tell me something, ANYTHING that the bible says about the anti-Christ. You keep saying "Revelations is all about the Anti-Christ." You show me ONE SINGLE PASSAGE in Revelations about the anti-Christ. I showed you the only four DIRECT references in the bible to the anti-Christ. If you find what you consider an indirect reference in Revelations, point it out.
The only things we are told about the anti-Christ in the bible:
There are many of them.
There have been anti-Christs since the time of John.
ANYONE (including my roommates) who denies the physical resurrection and godhood of the Son is the anti-Christ.
>>Me: The majority of Revelation is a description of the AC! I'm not about to copy/paste it here. I'm glad you can acknowledge Daniel ... <<
Tell me ONE PASSAGE. ONE VERSE. Or even answer my question as to WHICH PERSON in Revelations is the anti-Christ.
>>I'm not going to continue this. You're really not familiar with legitimate Biblical prophecy. <<
I'm beginning to think you never read Revelations at all.
It's clear to me that you are NOT familiar with the Bible and prophecy in particular.
Literally volumes have been written about this. I have never seen your home grown arbitrary interpretation before.
What you may want to do is read the Bible, understand the symbolism and then review this site:
http://www.messiahrevealed.org/
It matches up OLD and NEW Testament prophecy. It is consistent. It is not arbitrary. What is in the New Testament is not different than what is in the Old Testament. More or less detail is provided in both however both are describing the same events and Satan in his carious forms.
I pray you get over your pride and do this on your own. I fear your confusion is blinding you to fairly straight forward truth available to all who seek it.
SEEK IT!
Don't fabricate to suit your wishful predetermined outcome.