To: dpwiener
No: I'm looking at up to date returns
At the moment:
No on recall is: 2, 373, 871 with 68% of precincts reporting
Arnie is at: 2, 320, 062
The margin has been wider. But Davis has been ahead of Arnie for quite awhile.
To: rightbanker
NO MANDATE...NO MANDATE! lol
4,097 posted on
10/08/2003 12:08:58 AM PDT by
Fledermaus
(I DONATED! HAVE YOU? DONATE NOW OR I'LL HAVE YOU TAKEN OFF THE DO NOT CALL LIST)
To: rightbanker
No on recall is: 2, 373, 871 with 68% of precincts reporting
Arnie is at: 2, 320, 062
The margin has been wider. But Davis has been ahead of Arnie for quite awhile.
Wrong.
70.0 % ( 10661 of 15235 ) precincts reporting as of Oct 8, 2003 at 12:05 am
No 2,371,968
Arnold Schwarzenegger Rep 2,412,023
To: rightbanker
Oddly, I have friends who voted "No" on recall and McClintock for governor for personal principle reasons (don't ask me). Yet these people absolutely despised Davis. A "no" vote on recall should not be construed as a "yes" vote for Davis. If there wasn't a vote for the recall and just a vote for governor, they would have given Davis the finger.
4,104 posted on
10/08/2003 12:13:06 AM PDT by
tortoise
(All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
To: rightbanker
Davis had no competition other than himself. Arnold had to deal with both Bustamecha and McClintock. You are comparing apples and oranges.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson