[Fraulein]

Terrible and misguided -- and in many places, just flat-out wrong -- representation of even the very basics of Kantian thought. Embarrassing even to read.

[NutCrackerBoy]

Terrible and misguided -- and in many places, just flat-out wrong -- representation of even the very basics of Kantian thought. Embarrassing even to read.

I don't know from my own knowledge whether it misrepresents Kant. I think the article does make a single point well, about limits of knowledge. However, I find that point to be rather pedestrian. See discussion in Not Such a Bright Idea: Atheists Try a New Name