I don't see any ARNOLD contribs to a Democrat other than Mark Shriver unless I go all the way back to 1991-93, when he gave a grand to Joe Kennedy Jr. -- and a grand each to the CA GOP and Bruce Herschensohn. To answer your question, I don't like that Arnold's contribs to the GOP are light, at best, at least in the monetary sense. But once one filters out your deceptive inclusion of Maria's contributions, it's not nearly AS bad. In any event, to try, AGAIN, to get back to the original point: Isn't it true that Riordan's contributions to Democrats over the same period is much more than these somewhat troubling Arnold contribs-to-Democrats? Or does that not matter to you, given that your purpose isn't honest discussion of the issues but rather Arnold-bashing for its own sake?
Deceitful? Hah! All I did was post the entire report from the FEC.
I don't see any ARNOLD contribs to a Democrat other than Mark Shriver unless I go all the way back to 1991-93, when he gave a grand to Joe Kennedy Jr. -- and a grand each to the CA GOP and Bruce Herschensohn.
But you asserted there were none, very strongly and insultingly.
To answer your question, I don't like that Arnold's contribs to the GOP are light, at best, at least in the monetary sense.
Light? LOL...
But once one filters out your deceptive inclusion of Maria's contributions, it's not nearly AS bad.
Nothing deceptive about it. It is insulting for you to say it is. It's just the plain facts of the matter.
In any event, to try, AGAIN, to get back to the original point: Isn't it true that Riordan's contributions to Democrats over the same period is much more than these somewhat troubling Arnold contribs-to-Democrats?
They both suck to high heaven.
Or does that not matter to you, given that your purpose isn't honest discussion of the issues but rather Arnold-bashing for its own sake?
Only an AS supporter could consider the cold hard facts to be 'bashing'.