Skip to comments.
Ventura against celebrity pal getting the part
The Orange County Register ^
| September 26, 2003
| Keith Sharon
Posted on 09/26/2003 7:44:36 AM PDT by EveningStar
Edited on 04/14/2004 10:06:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
ST. PAUL
(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ocregister.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: arnold; arnoldschwarzenegger; california; californiarecall; jesseventura; recall; schwarzenegger; ventura
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: Dead Corpse
Please finish the first topic before introducing a second. Thank you.
Dan, maintaining my grip
21
posted on
09/26/2003 8:40:38 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
You seem to be trying to pass Arnold off as a Republican. You are lying. He is no "Republican".
I support a woman's right to choose. I support the state's current family planning programs, and as governor, would make no changes to this policy. Source: Campaign website, JoinArnold.com Aug 29, 2003
22
posted on
09/26/2003 8:45:33 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
All it takes to be a Republican is to register as a Republican. It isn't a religion. Schwarzenegger is, and as far as I know has always been, a Republican. YOU are lying, and it isn't even a "maybe."
Now, if you want to say he isn't an overall conservative, I'll certainly agree. I'll be hard-pressed not to add, "Duh."
But he is a Republican. In fact, he is the Republican front-runner.
You do need to apologize and retract, for your credibility's sake. Then if you want to be the ___th person to gasp, all startled, that he isn't a conservative on all issues, do it. You'll be greeted mostly by yawns, but not much argument.
Dan
23
posted on
09/26/2003 8:50:19 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
You remind me of those old idiots in Minnesota that would have voted for Hitler had he put a (D) next to his name.
If you have no principles, it really doesn't matter WHAT label you apply to yourself. If Clinton ran as a Republican, would you still vote for him?
From your statements, one could only conclude that you would.
24
posted on
09/26/2003 8:52:45 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
Ahh, the old pull Hitler out of the bag comment.
If Clinton ran against Hitler, who would you vote for?
25
posted on
09/26/2003 8:56:11 AM PDT
by
Registered
(Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: Dead Corpse
It's so sad/funny -- you lying and slandering, called on it beyond any honest doubt, and then accusing me of lacking principles and being a hypocrite.
If you won't take responsibility for your own words (-- a very conservative principle, btw), we've no basis for discussion. Sadly.
Dan
27
posted on
09/26/2003 9:01:27 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Vince Shank
He has 4 kids, who have to do their own laundry. Really.
To: Registered
The only reason I did so is because I've had that very same conversation with those "old idiot" DFL'ers in southern Minnesota who would do exactly that. It is also accurately illustrative of how dangerous it is to vote for party over principle. How do you think we got so far off as a country to begin with?
If a Two Party system was the Law, then I'd have to not vote. If no one else wanted to run against them, I'd put my own name in.
There are always options. You do NOT have to vote for the "lesser of two evils". Ever. Not and still pretend to live in a free country.
29
posted on
09/26/2003 9:04:26 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: BibChr
Since you support Arnold, even though there is another candidate on the ballot that more closely matches the GOPs conservative roots, it should then be axiomatic that you are pro-gun control, pro-abortion, and pro-social benefits for illegal aliens.
After all, if principles don't matter...
Your hypocrisy seems to know no boundries.
30
posted on
09/26/2003 9:06:50 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
See previous postings.
31
posted on
09/26/2003 9:08:29 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
From your previous postings it can only be assumed that you approve of being as socially liberal as Arnie.
32
posted on
09/26/2003 9:11:56 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: EggsAckley
He's jealous.
To: Dead Corpse
But you're an unrepentant liar, so who should care what you assume?
34
posted on
09/26/2003 9:15:11 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
Where exactly have I lied? You support a more liberal Republican over a perfectly viable conservative Republican. You have admitted that principles do not count, only party and celeberty count in YOUR OWN WORDS.
Being called a liar by a liar doesn't upset me in the least.
35
posted on
09/26/2003 9:17:08 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
Expected that.
Your lies, made and exposed, in this thread.
No more to say.
Dan
36
posted on
09/26/2003 9:28:25 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
Hhhmmmm... you may want to look again. No lies there. Just pointing out what a liberal you are and how much you are willing to give up for political expediency.
37
posted on
09/26/2003 9:32:25 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
Answered.
38
posted on
09/26/2003 9:34:28 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
The "real" was in quotes.
39
posted on
09/26/2003 9:36:39 AM PDT
by
DrewsDad
To: DrewsDad
In my post, yes. I know. I wrote it.
Your point?
Dan
40
posted on
09/26/2003 9:41:00 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson