Good statement. But there's so much wrong with the Stryker that it begs the question "Why?"
It was a wheeled vehicle that was rammed through (by Shinseki) with no discussion, completely sidestepping the normal acquisition process. And since then they've lied about test results that clearly show that the vehicle does not meet the basic requirements outlined in the concept plan.
The Stryker is only an interim vehicle on the Army's road to the "Objective Force." It is supposed to be (by design) better than anything else in the inventory. If we are going to use this same flawed procedure in the development of the "Future Combat System," then we're in trouble -- especially because that system is supposed to replace all other combat vehicles in the inventory.