[ex-snook]

"President Bush said Wednesday there was no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 - disputing an idea held by many Americans. "

Maybe he should tell that to Rumsfeld-Rice who keeps saying we are in Iraq because we don't want another 9/11 here.

[cyncooper]

How did you manage to miss this (Oh, did you not read the article and base your "comment" on the headline? Oops!)

"There's no question that Saddam Hussein had al-Qaida ties," the president said.

[Jorge]

Maybe he should tell that to Rumsfeld-Rice who keeps saying we are in Iraq because we don't want another 9/11 here.

Go back and read the article again.
Nowhere did Bush contradict anything Rumsfeld-Rice said.

Just because Saddam is known to have supported terrorism doesn't mean we know he was behind 9/11.