Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mossad1967
I would guess that their "dirty bomb" probably contains nothing more lethal than depleted uranium scavenged from various battlefields. It would be incapable of causing real radiological damage, but it would set off a blind panic among the gullible; that is, the media and the many victims of their anti-nuclear brainwashing.
16 posted on 09/16/2003 7:14:00 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy ( Anti-war movement: road-kill on the highway to freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JohnathanRGalt
ping
18 posted on 09/16/2003 7:16:29 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy
I would guess that their "dirty bomb" probably contains nothing more lethal than depleted uranium scavenged from various battlefields. It would be incapable of causing real radiological damage, but it would set off a blind panic among the gullible; that is, the media and the many victims of their anti-nuclear brainwashing.

I'd be happy if that's all they got (I'd be far happier if they don't even have that).

23 posted on 09/16/2003 7:21:24 PM PDT by steveegg (I have one thing to say to the big spenders; BLIZZARD OF RECALL TOUR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy
"It would be incapable of causing real radiological damage, but it would set off a blind panic among the gullible; that is, the media and the many victims of their anti-nuclear brainwashing."

We've been blooded and I think most people would act reasonably. The oanic in the streets scenario just doesn't hold water anymore. Sorry Jihad Dude.

30 posted on 09/16/2003 7:26:32 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy
I would guess that their "dirty bomb" probably contains nothing more lethal than depleted uranium scavenged from various battlefields

Considering how easy it is to scrounge cesium for medical locations and from old Soviet farm batteries .... they've GOT the material .... if they wanted it.

43 posted on 09/16/2003 7:59:06 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Islam : totalitarian political ideology / meme cloaked under the cover of religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy
No . . . They have really HOT uranium waste from nuclear facilities taken from Russia and real suit case nukes. There is a report from back in 2000.

The threat is real.

46 posted on 09/16/2003 8:22:06 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Read Sun Tsu: The Cold War Never Ended)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy
You are correct, sir! A dirty bomb would be very limited in range and it's effects are easily eliminated with proper preparation and taking a shower.

Pretty much the same with chemical weapons that do less damage if dispersed over a wide area. It has to be concentrated.

Biological weapons are a little more hazardous, but also easily avoided once unleashed and a fast quarantine of the effected and inoculations of others would limit it's damage.

I'm more worried about some large asteroid hitting the planet or Russia getting ticked and launching sub-based nukes in the large megaton level. Or China.
74 posted on 11/05/2003 7:40:58 PM PST by Fledermaus (I'm a conservative...not necessarily a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson