To: churchillbuff
A vote for McClintock is a vote for Bustamante. If you want to save California from the Democratic plague, vote Arnold.
8 posted on
08/23/2003 11:40:16 AM PDT by
Recourse
To: Recourse
A vote for McClintock is a vote for Bustamante. You are incorrect, a vote for McClintock is a vote for McClintock.
14 posted on
08/23/2003 11:42:31 AM PDT by
Mini-14
To: Recourse
>>>A vote for McClintock is a vote for Bustamante.That's a red herring! Arnold's a liberal RINO.
To: Recourse
A vote for McClintock is a vote for Bustamante. If you want to save California from the Democratic plague, vote Arnold. If I wanted to waste my vote, I would vote for Mickey Mouse instead. That would be fun.
Get lost, troll.
95 posted on
08/23/2003 1:08:56 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: Recourse
A vote for arnie is a vote for Bustamante!
To: All
How can anyone vote for someone who was ashamed to have a R after his name during the impeachment? Enuff Said.
Arnold for the good of California, why don't you bow out since you are so concern about the well being of the State.
I know enough about Arnold's Character with his views of the impeachment to last me a lifetime.
142 posted on
08/23/2003 1:58:00 PM PDT by
Two-Bits
(God Bless our Country, Our Military and their families, and President Bush!!!!!!)
To: Recourse
A vote for McClintock is a vote for Bustamante. If you want to save California from the Democratic plague, vote Arnold.It sounds like McClintock would have had an excellent chance at victory if the party hadn't decided to abandon the conservatives, again.
Ahhhhhnald's a liberal. He'll have to share the whacko vote with Bustamente. Why don't you Arnold supporters do the math and realize one conservative (McClintock) against two scary liberals is a good way to get a conservative win?
Or, could it be that you really don't want to cede the Republican Party to its core voting constituency...the ones who keep winning the elections for corporate, cheap foreign labor, globalist types?
161 posted on
08/23/2003 2:29:45 PM PDT by
grania
("Won't get fooled again")
To: Recourse
California would have a Perot or Nader situation here if there are too many Republicans in the race. Can the GOP beat the democrats if they are split? I don't think so. Time is short and I hope the GOP doesn't waste valuable time fighting amongst themselves instead of fighting for the recall and ouster of the entire Davis team.
To: Recourse
A vote for McClintock is a vote for Bustamante. If you want to save California from the Democratic plague, vote Arnold.HISTORY OF MODERATE REPUBLICANS
Nixon '68: Blew secure lead to within .1% of losing race.
Nixon '72: Won by landslide, but used dirty tricks that led to impeachment and near-collapse of Republican Party in 1974.
Ford '76: "No Soviet domination of Eastern Europe" remark in debates sank him in the polls and election. Maybe he was TOO moderate!
Bush '88: Won on 'unelectable' Reagan's coattails.
Bush '92: Broken No New Taxes Pledge led to Goldwater-like showing in the election.
Dole '96: 'Whatever' candidate now into second term --of doing Viagra and Pepsi ads.
Bush '00: Blew seventeen point lead to 537 votes by acting overconfident and not campaigning in Florida because he 'didn't need to.'
In light of the above, I'm not so sure that voting for Ah-node is a sure thing . . . indeed, it may be the best way to get Bustamante to get elected, when Ah-node melts down under Democrat pressure around October 1.
204 posted on
08/23/2003 4:56:06 PM PDT by
JoeSchem
(Has a moderate Republican ever moved to the RIGHT after getting elected?)
To: Recourse
BUZZ OFF WITH THE LEFT-WING STUFF ABOUT ARNOLD -- the last thing I want is my property taxes hiked.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson