[Bush2000]

If that is indeed the process, certainly. But, do you actually have information that establishes that is the process used by the BSA under these circumstances, or is this just your opinion?

Marshals don't just show up at your door wanting to search your place unless they intend to execute a warrant.

And, is this a last-resort effort? Would the owner have had an opportunity to resolve the problem voluntarily?

Personally, I think that BSA wanted to make an example of this guy. Just my opinion. And maybe a high-profile example is what they were looking for.

[justlurking]

Marshals don't just show up at your door wanting to search your place unless they intend to execute a warrant.

I asked for information about the process used by the BSA, not your opinion. I said I would concede the point, if you provided it. I'm still waiting.

Personally, I think that BSA wanted to make an example of this guy. Just my opinion. And maybe a high-profile example is what they were looking for.

Interestingly, that's exactly what the owner said:

They went right for the gut...I think it was because it was a new (geographical) area for them, and we're the No. 1 manufacturer in the county, so why not go after us?

If so, that's not "restitution", fair or otherwise. Maybe now you can see why some of us are uncomfortable with these tactics?