[hoosierskypilot]

But atheistic evolution purports to be fact, not a "guess." And any who challenge the "facts" concerning evolution are dismissed as unscientific.

Richard Goldschmidt (Evolution, As Viewed by One Geneticist American Scientist) says, "The incessant repetitionof this unproved claim (of micromutational evolution), glossing lightly over the difficulties, and the assumption of an arrogant attitude toward those who are not easily swayed by fashions of science, are considered to afford scientific proof of the doctrine."

I still contend it takes more faith to believe in evolution than to believe in God. But, if evolutionists were honest about the shortcoming of their religion, maybe there could be more honest dialogue.

[Rudder]

But, if evolutionists were honest about the shortcoming of their religion, maybe there could be more honest dialogue.

Talk about begging the question!!

[PatrickHenry]

I still contend it takes more faith to believe in evolution than to believe in God. But, if evolutionists were honest about the shortcoming of their religion, maybe there could be more honest dialogue.

I've been very civil in my responses to you, and I've also tried to be informative. But after your most recent post, I'm not going to bother any more. Trust me, I'm not abandoning our dialogue because the arguments you've presented are too powerful for me. Have a nice day.