Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RLK; Destructor
Break Out by Martin Russ about the Chosin Resevoir in winter '50-'51 clearly chronicles the Marines' complaints about the M1 carbine lacking the power to kill the heavily clothed chinese. I wasn't there so I guess I'll take their word for it.

257 posted on 08/08/2003 12:21:57 PM PDT by wtc911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911
An account of M-1 Garands failing.


"Combat Actions In Korea" from the Army Historical Series. Chapter 1: Withdrawal Action.

http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/korea/30-2/30-2_con.htm


During the period when the company was assembling and waiting in Pyongtaek, Sergeant Collins, the platoon sergeant who had joined the company the day before, decided to find out why his platoon had failed to fire effectively against the enemy. Of 31 members of his platoon, l2 complained that their rifles would not fire. Collins checked them and found the rifles were either broken, dirty, or had been assembled incorrectly. He sorted out the defective weapons and dropped them in a nearby well.
260 posted on 08/08/2003 12:33:20 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

To: wtc911
Break Out by Martin Russ about the Chosin Resevoir in winter '50-'51 clearly chronicles the Marines' complaints about the M1 carbine lacking the power to kill the heavily clothed chinese. I wasn't there so I guess I'll take their word for it.

During the US congressional hearings on the effectiveness and reliability of the M16 rifle in Vietnam, INTERARMCO/Interarms owner, weapons broker and dealer Sam Cummings was called to testify as an expert on the capabilities of the M16 and the Vietnamese and Korean fielded M1 and M2 carbines, since the congressmen were suspicious about the forthrightness of some of the testimony they'd received from Army Ordnance senior officers.

Commenting on the Carbine's WWII development as a replacement for the pistol for rear-area and support troops and that accordingly, its performance was more akin to that of a .32 or .38 pistol rather than a serious Infantryman's rifle and that in comparison, it was a *dog,* the Representatives were mildly shocked when their own stenographer jumped up and said *He's right! He's right! During the Battle of the Bulge, I popped a Kraut with eight hits from with my carbine, and the bastard got back up and nailed me....*

It seems the congressional investigators hadn't needed to have gone to such great lengths to find a real expert. They had one working for them all along....

-archy-/-

261 posted on 08/08/2003 12:37:34 PM PDT by archy (Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

To: wtc911
Break Out by Martin Russ about the Chosin Resevoir in winter '50-'51 clearly chronicles the Marines' complaints about the M1 carbine lacking the power to kill the heavily clothed chinese. I wasn't there so I guess I'll take their word for it.

----------------------

As I said, I test firearms and ammunition. A carbine slub can petrate 10 inches of pine with no problem. I also test penetration on the steel of pick-up truck wheels. 41 and 44 magnums will push their way through 1/8 inch steel leaving a dent around the hole. A carbine melts its way through before the steel has a chance to dent.

It's difficult for me to believe a carbine shot wouldn't penetrate clothing.

Many people don't understand what it takes to kill. When I was in the army the old sergeants used to remark when you hit someone with a lethal shot, they don't go down immediately. The carbine or even the 30-06 or .308 leaves a clean wound in military ammunition dure to the Geneva Convention. Hitting a man in the foreward midline with a carbine would probably blow out his spine and bring him down immediately. A side gut shot or lung shot would be lethal, but not before he attacked another 50 or 100 yards and fell. The average solder who sees his buddy die during that interval assumes the enemy isn't being hit.

As sighted, the carbine has an effective distance of 125 yards. There are quick sight adjustments on the weapont for greater distances. Not one soldier in 10 was trained to use those adjustments.

The 30-06 and 308 are a different matter. At 300 yards the slug is just getting started. On Fort Leonard Wood trainfire, before most people here were born, I hit 46 out of 48 lethal shots at 300 yards with a Garand. That was the limit of my eyesight with partially corrected glasses. Anything 300 yards away takes a bullet. Basically, If I cans see it, it's in big trouble. Whether the targe runs another 50 or 100 yards after being hit is inconsequential at that range. Right now we don't have a widely distributed service rifle that can do that. If a Garand or M14 were scoped, nothing survives at 500 yards. Yes, I know they are not designed to be scoped.

I would have been in favor of taking the carbine design, lengthening the cartrige by 1/8 inch, using 1/16 inch more lead and a more powerful charge.

301 posted on 08/08/2003 6:58:23 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson