Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perfesser
I suggest people read your comments and others as a case study in missing the point. Most people reading this thread have not experienced the power trip of high rolling, so they are inclined to believe your "it's only gambling" argument. Some of those then question the judgement of a man who gambles such large quanities.

But it's all beside the point. The point of high rolling is to say "I can squander money so quickly that you will stick around just for a tiny fraction of it." It also says "When I go to the casino, I get treated with the utmost respect because they really know who I am" and "My $10,000 per hand bets is my qualification for this private room, etc."

These are statements of pure Vanity. This is not the same as consumption (a mercedes is comfortable and holds value), charity (personal satisfaction), or extravagance (Keynesian economic stimulation). It is about being high from when the limo picks you up to when it drops you off. Power corrupts and a virtuous man does not voluntarily put himself in the position where he can be corrupted.

213 posted on 08/01/2003 4:08:42 AM PDT by palmer (paid for by the "Lazamataz for Supreme Ruler" campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: palmer
The point of high rolling is to say "I can squander money so quickly that you will stick around just for a tiny fraction of it." It also says "When I go to the casino, I get treated with the utmost respect because they really know who I am" and "My $10,000 per hand bets is my qualification for this private room, etc."

I wouldn't be focused so much on high rolling as fame and wealth in general. You don't have to gamble to get treated like royalty in restaurants, resorts, etc.

Is Bennett vain? He may be. Most of us are, in some way. ALL of us sin. So because he is a human sinner, like us all, he cannot speak to morality? My friend, you will have a hard time finding someone pure enough to encourage good values.

221 posted on 08/01/2003 2:15:48 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

To: palmer
Do I correctly understand you to mean that VANITY is a bad thing?
226 posted on 08/01/2003 3:19:24 PM PDT by Perfesser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson