Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A Navy Vet
I guess I'm still confused with the definition of anarchy, and how that term would apply even in the Heinlein model.

De La Paz suggests this form for those who are predisposed to governmental structure, and will likely seek some state construct anyway.

(thereby aiding in the ultimate advancement of liberty)

But at the same time lives his own life outside the bounds of any state, appealing instead to his own moral authority for guidance, and choosing only such actions as can be substantiated by his moral code.

699 posted on 07/15/2003 5:53:05 PM PDT by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 697 | View Replies ]


To: OWK
Got it. But shirley you must realize that the fickle character of mankind dictates (ugh) some sort of societal contract, especially in this high-tech weaponry and nano-second communications era. Then there's always the just plain evil types who need to dictate (haha).

Unfortunately, men do need controls to live in peace with each other in an ever shrinking World. The trade-off point is the debate. But we certainly don't need what our out-of-control politicians have brought on us for decades now.

706 posted on 07/15/2003 6:05:11 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (Fedgov is the problem, not the solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson