Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: huck von finn
Powell chose not to use it because he doubted its veracity. He knew about it.

He may not have used it before the Security Council but the State Department did issue a press release in December 02 that included the claim. This was, of course 9 months after the CIA operative had returned with the finding of bogus.

I cannot figure out how to post that document but I will email it to anyone who cares to see it. It is in pdf as an image so you cannot use the clip board to take out the text.

385 posted on 07/12/2003 4:52:38 PM PDT by Mike4Freedom (Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]


To: Mike4Freedom
How inconsistent that such a thing would happen! And for anyone who wondered why intelligence sharing between the US and UK seemed shady, take a look at this article, just out from UK:

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,997243,00.html

?? Still many unanswered questions.
395 posted on 07/12/2003 5:09:32 PM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]

To: Mike4Freedom
the CIA operative had returned with the finding of bogus.

Hopefully by now you've seen much information about Joseph Wilson, who is NOT a CIA operative, btw, and his "report" was certainly not conclusive or the end of the matter. The fact remains that the U.S. and Britain are sure (Britain VERY sure, U.S. unable to substantiate enough to pronounce it true, yet) that Iraq was in fact seeking to obtain uranium in Africa.

629 posted on 07/12/2003 9:46:44 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson