Replies

We did you didn't. There is nothing UN Constitutional about entering a home with a search warrant that was issued through due process

Indeed there is. An Unconstitutional law may not be enforced with any legal (or moral) validity.

Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

Regardless of what the SC found - a law banning sodomy for just gays is Unconstitutional.

You do realize there were gay people having sex before this ruling? And no 'new' gays will have sex because of it?

You're not going to stop gay men from having sex.
You're not going to stop gay men from having sex.
You're not going to stop gay men from having sex.

They say that key to learning is repetition. Figured it couldn't hurt.

I really don't get the whole Fundie sex obsession.

If two gays were on my property having sex, I'd make 'em leave, maybe even call the cops for trespassing.

But I certainly don't think I have the right to go into their houses and stop them from having sex.

The arrogance of Fundies is without limit.

Okay since you think that works.

That was not the majority legally binding opinion.
That was not the majority legally binding opinion.
That was not the majority legally binding opinion.
That was not the majority legally binding opinion.

All that matters is the majority legally binding opinion.
All that matters is the majority legally binding opinion.
All that matters is the majority legally binding opinion.
All that matters is the majority legally binding opinion.

It sets precedent and can influence future cases on different subjects.
It sets precedent and can influence future cases on different subjects.
It sets precedent and can influence future cases on different subjects.
It sets precedent and can influence future cases on different subjects.

Somehow I don't think it will be able to get past the agenda so well programmed in your head.