[kuma]

We did you didn't. There is nothing UN Constitutional about entering a home with a search warrant that was issued through due process. You are deeply in denial about what the majority opinion, the binding opinion, was that threw away the Texas legislators responsibilities as enumerated in the Constitution. The Supremes violated the Constitution.

You know as well as I that there is no court to appeal to. However, you are correct. The next logical course is to follow the Constitutional process of an Amendment. I'm sure you don't object. Oops wait of course you did on other threads. How dare Legislators follow Constitutional procedures to add an Amendment.

[DAnconia55]

We did you didn't. There is nothing UN Constitutional about entering a home with a search warrant that was issued through due process

Indeed there is. An Unconstitutional law may not be enforced with any legal (or moral) validity.

Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

Regardless of what the SC found - a law banning sodomy for just gays is Unconstitutional.

You do realize there were gay people having sex before this ruling? And no 'new' gays will have sex because of it?

You're not going to stop gay men from having sex.
You're not going to stop gay men from having sex.
You're not going to stop gay men from having sex.

They say that key to learning is repetition. Figured it couldn't hurt.

[olorin]

The police in the Lawrence case did not have a search warrant.