Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Digger
and what would you do if GW signed the Kyoto treaty, then the Crime court, then any of the other items listed. When would you say is ENOUGH?

Uh Digger, those are hypotheticals and not based in reality. Is it really that hard for you to stay in reality?

28 posted on 07/01/2003 9:13:20 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Dane
Something is being left out of this discussion. The President cannot enter into treaties without the consent of the Senate and they supported neither Kyoto nor ICC.

My daughter's science textbook prattled on about how GWB killed Kyoto. She stopped the discussion and asked her teacher: "Didn't the Senate vote 95-0 against it?" Well, ummm, yes that's true. "And wouldn't the Kyoto treaty only reduced the projected rise by 10%?" Another umm, yes. Same with the International Criminal Court. The Senate voted against it but Masturbater-in-Chief Clinton signed it anyway. Leaving his successor the dirty duty of confirming our country's opposition. He ludicrous reasoning was that we could better influence it if we signed it. Yeah, give away your chief negotiating point - moron.

As for the ABM treaty with the USSR. The USSR no longer exists but we withdrew under the provisions of the treaty. We didn't abrogate it or violate it as some in the media portray our actions. The treaty had provisions for either side to get out with proper notification and we followed that.

47 posted on 07/01/2003 9:32:00 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson