To: DAnconia55
I think you forgot the </sarcasm> tag. Or are you by any chance being so deliberately outrageous as to try to point out the absurdity of libertarianism taken to an extreme?
To: aristeides
Polycarp:
"SCOTUS just undermined every law in the country based upon public morals."
Good. About damned time, too.
-186- posted by DAnconia55
aristeides wrote:
I think you forgot the </sarcasm> tag. Or are you by any chance being so deliberately outrageous as to try to point out the absurdity of libertarianism taken to an extreme?
-to 186-
The true absurdity is your view that SCOTUS just undermined every law in the country based upon 'public morals'.
You claim to be an attorny, an 'officer of the court', yet you dishonor our constitutional system of law.
- Go figure. -
204 posted on
06/29/2003 6:49:40 PM PDT by
tpaine
(Really, I'm trying to be a 'decent human being', but me flesh is weakn)
To: aristeides
I think you forgot the tag. Or are you by any chance being so deliberately outrageous as to try to point out the absurdity of libertarianism taken to an extreme? Hmm. We're miscommunicating. I'll be direct.
All laws that are called 'public morals' laws that have nothing to do with preventing force or fraud should be overturned.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson