[Cathryn Crawford]

I think she's pretty heartless. She left him in her car to die. Doing the deed - hitting him - is one thing. She left him to die. That cinches it for me.

[pepperhead]

I think she's pretty heartless. She left him in her car to die. Doing the deed - hitting him - is one thing. She left him to die. That cinches it for me.

She did worse than just leave him to die. She took him to a place where he couldn't be found to be helped. Too bad she didn't get more time. I sure help she doesn't reproduce in prison.

[A_perfect_lady]

She left him to die.

She didn't just leave him to die, she hid him so no one else could help him, and she came again and again into the garage to check and see if he was dead yet. She kept him hidden to ensure he died. That's murder. I wish they'd give her the chair, followed by the firing squad, followed by hanging, followed by the guillotine.

[night reader]

She left him in her car to die. Doing the deed - hitting him - is one thing. She left him to die. That cinches it for me.
====================================
Worse than leaving him in the car to die. If she had ditched the car at the scene and run away, he could at least have been found and perhaps saved. If she had dragged him out of the car and left him on the side of the road, he might have had a chance. But she deliberately took the dying man to a place where he had NO chance of rescue. She concealed him from any possibility of succor. It was murder in the first, alright!

As to the mitigating circumstance of being impaired by her intake of marijuana, and ecstacy, and driving while intoxicated ... those are not mitigants but should have been separately prosecuted with additional penalties piled on.

Somewhere between 99 to life with no possibilty of parole sounds about right for her. But what did the Texas taxpayer ever do to deserve being hit up for her food, clothing, shelter, and medical expenses? More I think of it, the better "Ole Sparky" sounds.