Skip to comments.
300,000 M-14s destined for trash pile
WorldNet Daily ^
| June 15, 2003
Posted on 06/15/2003 1:13:08 PM PDT by Mini-14
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: joesnuffy
We'll probably end up paying $500 bucks a piece to destroy them.
To: Mini-14
I don't know. You know the BATF line; "Once a machinegun, ALWAYS a machinegun."
Just think about all the owners of re-welded M14 receivers, which were supposedly "demilled", who recently faced BATF agents at their doors with orders to seize them (the receivers). I don't see how these are going to be allowed into civilian or non-agency hands. The best we can hope for is to keep them for the Armed Services, who actually WANT these rifles in the inventory.
42
posted on
06/15/2003 4:09:32 PM PDT
by
SJSAMPLE
To: Shooter 2.5
I saw a high speed photograph of a .308 being deflected by a playing card.What was the MOA of deflection?
Eaker
43
posted on
06/15/2003 4:11:05 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(AdiĆ³s reality; I want to be a Jack-Ass millionaire!!............;<)
To: Mini-14; Shooter 2.5; Travis McGee
Some years ago the Aussie government sponsored the BTEC program, a massive aerial cull across the northern part of the country. The aim was to shoot from helicopter hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of unbranded cattle, wild horses, donkeys and buffalo in an attempt to wipe out brucellosis and TB in domestic stock. The program went on for years. The weapon of choice for the shooters (who were able to use any type of rifle they wanted, including other quality ones like SIGs and SLRs) was invariably the M-14. It was selected on the basis of its accuracy, reliability and pointability. That rifle cycles flawlessly when kept clean and has enough weight on the forend hand to keep your sight picture when shooting. It seems very short-sighted to destroy these rifles, disparaging comments made here about it's weight notwithstanding.
44
posted on
06/15/2003 4:12:29 PM PDT
by
Byron_the_Aussie
(http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
To: Mini-14
Re:
300,000 M-14s destined for trash pile OH THE HUMANITY !!
45
posted on
06/15/2003 4:15:09 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
(Piss off a liberal: Hire Someone.)
To: FreePaul
You're older than I thought!
46
posted on
06/15/2003 4:21:46 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: Shooter 2.5
"I saw a high speed photograph of a .308 being deflected by a playing card."
Sure, but compare to a .223 bullet weighin 1/3 as much, and designed to fragment.
I'd rather stop an attacker before he gets into the range of a typical 200 yard firefight.
To: Eaker
Since it only showed the card and bullet, I think it was about ten degrees.
48
posted on
06/15/2003 4:59:33 PM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Centurion2000
What a damn travesty.It sure is. Did you sign the petition?
49
posted on
06/15/2003 5:01:23 PM PDT
by
J Jay
To: steplock; Squantos; Travis McGee
BUMP!
50
posted on
06/15/2003 5:01:51 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(I was born my Papa's son....when I hit the ground I was on the run.....)
To: steplock
Me too...and I noticed a number of FReeper's names I recognized.
Good Work.
Wife of Wardaddy.
51
posted on
06/15/2003 5:06:51 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(I was born my Papa's son....when I hit the ground I was on the run.....)
To: Mini-14
To: Beelzebubba
I forgot about the fragmenting part. That's a good point.
53
posted on
06/15/2003 5:21:30 PM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: steplock
Signed bump!
54
posted on
06/15/2003 5:40:09 PM PDT
by
cibco
(Xin Loi... Saddam)
To: cibco
Just signed also. There were only 8394, so far signed on. What a travesty to wasxte the resources which could aid our honorable veterans.
55
posted on
06/15/2003 5:43:23 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: ExSES
I got my Garand from DCM about ten years ago and it cost me $165.00. How did they send it to me? U.S. Mail.
56
posted on
06/15/2003 5:51:06 PM PDT
by
ExSoldier
(M1911A1: The ORIGINAL "Point and Click" interface!)
To: ExSoldier
About two years later, they were 225 dollars. A year or two after that, they were at the present day prices. The only good thing today is you can buy almost as many as you want. I really don't know how many Service Grades you can buy in a year but you can buy eight Rack grades and one collector grade in one calender year.
57
posted on
06/15/2003 6:03:47 PM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: OldCorps
"I'd want a soldier in each platoon armed with a sniper version of the M14."The sniper version of the M14 is the M21 originally equipped with the ART (Auto Rangefinding Telescope) 3X12 scope and it was a heavy sucker. I had my Springfield Armory M1A upgraded by ROBAR with with an action job and their NP3 coating for the internals as well as their ROGUARD (Black) on all external parts and I mounted a Harris bipod and Shepherd rangefinding scope and it STILL doesn't weigh what an M21 did. Finally, my buddy, a former SEAL sniper worked his magic at the range and helped me zero and "set" the barrel as he put it. Anyway it's a 500 meter tackdriver. Funny thing, the aiming circles on the Shepherd scope are for an 18 inch diameter and set for a specific bullet weight (I chose 168 gr Federal Boattail MATCH) and they say it's the diameter of a Deer's shoulder area....it also happens to approximate the area of a man's chest. Hmmmmm.
58
posted on
06/15/2003 6:14:22 PM PDT
by
ExSoldier
(M1911A1: The ORIGINAL "Point and Click" interface!)
To: wardaddy; TEXASPROUD
read later bump...........Stay Safe
59
posted on
06/15/2003 8:38:54 PM PDT
by
Squantos
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
To: Mini-14
If the Feds want to get rid of M-14s, I'll be happy to take one off their hands.
60
posted on
06/15/2003 8:41:44 PM PDT
by
Sparta
(Tagline removed by moderator)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson