Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Atlas Shrugged,' Take Five
Box Office Mojo ^ | 5/18/03 | Scott Holleran

Posted on 06/08/2003 1:41:51 PM PDT by RJCogburn

Fans of Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged have heard this one before: the movie rights have been sold and the enduring bestseller is coming to the silver screen.

Admirers of the epic 1957 novel may be skeptical of the news that Beverly Hills-based Crusader Entertainment bought the rights to Rand's story of the mind on strike.

Past attempts to make Atlas Shrugged into a movie have failed, though Crusader president and CEO Howard Baldwin is arguably better prepared than his predecessors. He has read Rand's gigantic novel, he has hired a top screenwriter and -- consistent with Rand's literary philosophy -- he's already thinking larger than life.

"Our goal is to adapt the book without any restrictions," Baldwin said during an exclusive interview with Box Office Mojo from his office in Beverly Hills. Baldwin said it's too early to peg the project as a three-hour movie, a miniseries or even a trilogy. "It may be two movies, it may be three," he teased. "We want to tell Atlas Shrugged properly."

That's no easy task. The novel, over 1,000 pages long, presents the essential principles of Rand's radical philosophy of self-interest, reason and capitalism.

While Atlas Shrugged is routinely vilified by left-wing intellectuals, who oppose Rand's view that capitalism is the only moral economic system, and repudiated by those on the right, who shudder at Rand's rejection of religion, it remains deeply loved by readers, who named it the second most influential book of their lives in a 1991 Library of Congress/Book-of-the-Month club survey -- behind only the Bible.

As a movie, its potential to move audiences is profound. Today's times seem taken straight from the pages of Atlas Shrugged: New York City at the core of a disastrous climax, businessmen under government persecution, chronic train wrecks and the slow, grinding halt of society's basic functions. The Ayn Rand Institute describes it as "Ayn Rand's complete philosophy, dramatized in the form of a mystery story 'not about the murder of a man's body, but about the murder — and rebirth — of man’s spirit."

Baldwin said Crusader became interested last year after billionaire businessman and Crusader Entertainment Chairman Philip Anschutz -- himself the recent target of government regulators -- noticed a front page USA Today article about the tremendous influence of Atlas Shrugged among business leaders.

"Phil gave me a call and said, 'Can we get this?'" It didn't hurt that one of Baldwin's friends, businessman Ed Snider, was cited in the article. Snider had previously owned the movie rights to Atlas Shrugged, and put Baldwin on track to buy them.

Baldwin projected a long development -- funded by Crusader -- though he said he expects a script treatment by the end of this summer. Screenwriter James V. Hart (Contact, Tuck Everlasting, Bram Stoker's Dracula), who penned Crusader's Sahara starring Matthew McConaughey, is writing the script.

Crusader is the latest entertainment company to take a crack at Atlas. Rand, who died in 1982 at age 77, sold the rights to producer Albert S. Ruddy (The Godfather) in 1972 -- but a movie was never made. Later, writer and producer Stirling Silliphant (In the Heat of the Night, The Towering Inferno) wrote a script for an NBC television miniseries -- which was killed by NBC executive Fred Silverman.

In 2000, Turner Network Television sought to make an original miniseries, with Albert Ruddy as producer -- but the deal fell apart in the wake of AOL's merger with TimeWarner and the devastating Sept. 11 attack by Islamic terrorists. Ruddy later tried to make a feature-length movie but his contract expired before he could secure financing.

Baldwin said Crusader is prepared to tackle the obstacles associated with such an ambitious undertaking. In keeping with Rand's view that making money is virtuous, Baldwin said he fully expects to make a profit from Atlas Shrugged.

"Atlas Shrugged is not going to be a low budget movie," Baldwin said. "But I think the box office potential is huge, because of the enormous interest. It is one of the best-selling books of all time."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: atlasshrugged; aynrand
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: DoctorMichael
Screenplay to be written by James Hart......

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/925412/posts
21 posted on 06/08/2003 5:24:56 PM PDT by RJCogburn (Yes, I will call it bold talk for a......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Re: Your Link to the James Hart Thread........

Hmmmmmmmm..........He certainly has an interesting list of past accomplishments. I used to think that this book was undoable, but with the technical success of Peter Jackson's LOTR {which translates INTO Box Office success} I now believe that this novel can be made in all its Glory, Meaning and Philosophical Truth. The right person CAN do it. Maybe he's the one?

Thanks.

22 posted on 06/08/2003 5:40:09 PM PDT by DoctorMichael (.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode; OWK
Ayn Rand wrote of two types of journalism.

Your posts are an example of the first. You make a statement - which is really a conclusion - without any information or evidence to back it up, and expect the readers to accept your statement without question as if it were a philosophical primary; Swallow it whole, in other words. That is simply a ploy to end all discussion. (And besides, do you think anyone here on FR actually cares what you feel about something?)

The second type of journalist presents evidence and allows the reader to make the judgement whether the material is "crap" or not. That is what is missing from your lame posts.

I find it fascinating that so many people such as yourself exude a visceral hatred of Ayn Rand. I suppose it is an example of the same type of mentality that "feels" it is OK to kill Israeli children or abortion doctors in "the name of God".

23 posted on 06/08/2003 5:58:36 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bonforte
Where is King Vidor when we need him?
24 posted on 06/08/2003 6:00:11 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
I still like Denzel Washington as Galt.

Give me Morgan Freeman, or give me Kenneth Branagh....

;-)

25 posted on 06/08/2003 6:13:31 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: supercat
I saw the movie for my economics class as an undergraduate. Unfortunately, at that time, I had no interest in Rand, and had no idea what I was getting ready to watch. I do recall there were some great lines in the movie during the trial scene.

I look forward to seeing Atlas Shrugged on the screen as well.
26 posted on 06/08/2003 6:26:52 PM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bonforte
Mel Gibson as John Galt.
27 posted on 06/08/2003 6:28:37 PM PDT by Beck_isright (When Senator Byrd landed on an aircraft carrier, the blacks were forced below shoveling coal...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Where is King Vidor when we need him?

Looks like a no-nonsense kind of guy.


28 posted on 06/08/2003 6:32:40 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: supercat
The Fountainhead was very well cast.


29 posted on 06/08/2003 6:40:00 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Casting suggestions?

Arnold Schwarzenegger as John Galt
Jim Carrey as Hank Rearden
J-Lo as Dagny Taggart

30 posted on 06/08/2003 7:41:53 PM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
We can only hope that those that are too stupid to read, might actually be energized to read the entire novel or at least get the audio book version. But I doubt it. They will probably screw up one of the great works of all time and turn it into leftist drivel.

In 1943, in the midst of WWII, Italian film-makers did an excellent-- and faithful-- adaptation of Rand's We the Living. Since Italy was under the boot at the time, the Nazis simply refused to release it-- because they got it right!

31 posted on 06/08/2003 8:27:09 PM PDT by BradyLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
In 1943, in the midst of WWII, Italian film-makers did an excellent-- and faithful-- adaptation of Rand's We the Living

It's available on video. In Italian with subtitles and worth watching.

32 posted on 06/09/2003 4:17:02 AM PDT by RJCogburn (Yes, I will call it bold talk for a......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
I find it fascinating that so many people such as yourself exude a visceral hatred of Ayn Rand. I suppose it is an example of the same type of mentality that "feels" it is OK to kill Israeli children or abortion doctors in "the name of God".

I suspect you are right about Ethan Clive. I doubt he can produce two rational objections to Rand and would focus any rant produced towards either Rand's atheism or that her works on ideaology are too ideaological.

33 posted on 06/09/2003 4:31:10 AM PDT by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Johnny Depp as Francisco. Gwynneth Paltrow or Kate Blanchett (that type) as Dagny. Mel Gibson sounds good as Galt, but Denzel would be intriuging.
34 posted on 06/09/2003 4:35:49 AM PDT by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
I have done both. I even paid to see the movie when it came out. Afterwards, I read the book. What I found amazing about the book was the ability to fairly accurately predict the future. I found it interesting that while the book was written in the 1950's and set in the far future, the prediction/look back at the 1980' and 1990's was generally spot on. Especially when Heinlen wrote about roving street gangs across the world and how the veterans of the last great war tired of this anarchy and put an end to it, thus setting up the form of government present in the book. You see that today in America and now in England.

The movie was crap but either by accident or design, the scene with Ironside as the history instructor was more or less faithful to the book. That violence has to be used to squash violence and that there are concepts not only worht fighting for but also dying for - freedom, liberty, honor. Unfortunately, the concept of going back to war to rescue one POW kept by the enemy never made it into the film. Too much for people to handle.

I read this book around the same time that I converted to the Catholic faith. Though I am not as smart as Heinlen I have come around to believe that while the teachings of Jesus is right and proper - love the Lord, love your neighbor, love yourself, turn the other cheek, live a peaceful life - I have also come to believe that there are people that must do things that while maintaining the freedom and liberty of the majority, dooms their souls.

35 posted on 06/09/2003 4:47:44 AM PDT by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a 100 pounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bonforte
Signoury Weaver for Dagny? Russell Crowe for Hank Rearden? Could Mel Gibson be in this somewhere? If I was the producer or putting my money on the line, I would require that everyone read the novel before filming began.
36 posted on 06/09/2003 4:56:23 AM PDT by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a 100 pounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bonforte
I like Willem DeFoe for Rearden. Banderas is a good choice for Francisco, and so would Andy Garcia. Casting will be a very important aspect of making the film a successful adaptation.
37 posted on 06/09/2003 5:42:56 AM PDT by Space Wrangler (Now I know what it's like washing windows when you know that there are pigeons on the roof...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
Harrison Ford as Hank Rearden.
38 posted on 06/09/2003 1:33:13 PM PDT by Beck_isright (When Senator Byrd landed on an aircraft carrier, the blacks were forced below shoveling coal...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba; RJCogburn
Jeff Bridges as Rearden
Elizabeth Shue as Dagny
Randy Quaid as Jim Taggart
Woody Harrelson as Eddie Willers
Russell Crowe as Wyatt
Brad Pitt actually would make a good John Galt
Andy Garcia as Francisco
Val Kilmer as Ragnar
Bruce Willis as Midas Mulligan
Harrison Ford as Hugh Akston
Gary Oldman as Halley
39 posted on 06/24/2003 10:36:01 AM PDT by TradicalRC (Fides quaerens intellectum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn; All
Any further news anybody?
40 posted on 05/02/2004 3:19:20 AM PDT by The Raven (<<----Click Screen name to see why I vote the way I do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson