Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cathryn Crawford
From www.TheOnion.com:

U.S. Out Of My Uterus

Op Ed Photo

It comes down to one thing: It's my body. Not Uncle Sam's, not Trent Lott's, not Pat Robertson's. Mine. Congress can demand a portion of my income, it can tell me how fast to drive, it can kill killers and anyone else it thinks it must to preserve a free and civil society. But my body—the skin, bones and organs that comprise me—is where the line gets drawn.

The decision to have or not have a child is mine and mine alone. I am not cattle for the government to order about, demanding that I bring an unwanted child to term. Stripping me of the right to control my own destiny dehumanizes me, period. Anything less than my choice, on my terms, reduces me to property.

The right-wing anti-choice movement loves to preach its views from an idealistic, pie-in-the-sky universe where nothing uncomfortable ever has to happen to anyone, but that's not reality. Life is filled with pain and hard choices. Choices one may or may not regret later. But it's that individual's right to make the choice.

You think America is the land of the free? The last country on Earth that would ever oppress women? My grandmother remembers when women could not vote in this country. And, boy, do we have a lot more progress left to make.

One certainly has to wonder: How would things be different if men could get pregnant? It would certainly be fun to watch the patriarchal elite of Congress scramble to cover themselves if it all changed overnight.

And one more thing: Who would care for all the children born into a world that prohibits abortion? Who would be there to raise all those unwanted, abandoned children? It would certainly be a different world, full of orphanages jammed with parentless children, robbed of a fair chance to grow up in a stable environment because of what some politician deemed moral in some oak-walled chamber on Capitol Hill. To say nothing of the women maimed or even killed by barbaric, back-alley abortions because a bunch of rich, white men made the safe alternative unavailable to her.

Keep your laws off my body, America.


U.S. Out Of My Uterus
<B>By Gen. William Patterson</B><BR>U.S. Army

To protect America's interests, it is sometimes necessary to mobilize and deploy a military force. We now stand on the brink of such a time.

The tactical importance of Jessica Linden's uterus to national security is twofold: First, with its rich, fertile walls, this uterus is a vital source of future Americans. Second, the uterus is situated in an extremely strategic location, leaving it vulnerable to a hostile foreign power. This uterus must be given top priority by the Pentagon. Establishing a strong U.S. military presence in Jessica Linden's uterine region is by far the most sensible course of action.

I propose that four U.S. Army divisions be deployed to Jessica Linden's uterus no later than midnight Friday. Once there, a reconnaissance force of 200 men will be stationed on her cervical perimeter, denying entrance to any unauthorized personnel or equipment. Another two battalions will be stationed inside the uterus itself, where they will set up camp and, if necessary, conduct armed patrols in force.

Remaining personnel will conduct amphibious patrol in the forward vaginal canal and as far back as the fallopian entrances, scouting for cervical dilation or other such activity. The entire operation will receive air support from a wing of Blackhawk helicopters, which will rotate in pairs patrolling the greater vaginal area. Our forces will constitute a impenetrable iron diaphragm, preventing any and all foreign elements from compromising uterine security.

Should we encounter a foreign power disputing our claim upon the Linden uterus and surrounding vagina, we will be prepared to engage its forces in armed conflict. We will consider the nation's safety our number one priority, regardless of Ms. Linden's unwillingness to cooperate.

The Pentagon will consider a full-scale invasion of Jessica Linden's ovaries only as a last resort, after all other options have been exhausted. We recognize in principle Jessica Linden's sovereignty over the ovarian territory, but to prevent the loss of the reproductive system to a hostile power, we are prepared to do what we must, even if that means conducting a firebombing and strafing campaign that may result in full military hysterectomy. If we must destroy the uterus in order to save it, so be it.

If U.S. uterine occupation extends into the second week of October, we will install an irrigation and drainage system in anticipation of Miss Linden's menstrual cycle. This will not only benefit her, but provide our troops with a cleaner, more navigable terrain on which to conduct their military maneuvers.

I will further recommend that Congress establish a new Military Medal of Valor, to be called The Distinguished Cervix Cross For Courage In The Uterine Theatre. Naval soldiers may also request a burial within Miss Linden in the event of loss of life.

The U.S. must and will defend its interests in Jessica Linden's uterus, no matter what the costs.

88 posted on 06/06/2003 11:30:53 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I've decided to cut back my tagline, one word at a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz
LOL
95 posted on 06/06/2003 11:33:41 AM PDT by gcruse (Superstition is a mind in chains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
LMAO
99 posted on 06/06/2003 11:35:37 AM PDT by Cathryn Crawford (Save your breath. You'll need it to blow up your date.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
Unborn babies' bodies?... Just like the poor ignored Iraqis. It's that uterus that is strategic, and the Iraqis, er, I mean, the babies can fend for themselves. [Imagine what 'every man, er , bee for himself' would mean to honey production!]
116 posted on 06/06/2003 11:42:29 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
That is actually really funny. So, how's it going in Suriname?
138 posted on 06/06/2003 11:51:11 AM PDT by ValenB4 (Absence makes the fond grow harder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

U. S. Out of My Plantation

It comes down to one thing: It's my plantation. Not Uncle Sam's, not Charles Sumner's, not Frederick Douglass's. Mine. Congress can demand a portion of my income, it can tell me how fast to drive, it can kill killers and anyone else it thinks it must to preserve a free and civil society. But my plantation—the house, fields and crops that I own—is where the line gets drawn.

The decision to have or not have a slave is mine and mine alone. I am not cattle for the government to order about, demanding that I free my slaves. Stripping me of the right to control my own destiny dehumanizes me, period. Anything less than my choice, on my terms, reduces me to property.

The abolitionist movement loves to preach its views from an idealistic, pie-in-the-sky universe where nothing uncomfortable ever has to happen to anyone, but that's not reality. Life is filled with pain and hard choices. Choices one may or may not regret later. But it's that individual's right to make the choice.

You think America is the land of the free? The last country on Earth that would ever oppress land owners? My grandmother remembers when women could not vote in this country. And, boy, do we have a lot more progress left to make.

And one more thing: Who would care for all the Negros born into a world that prohibits slavery? Who would be there to raise all those unwanted Negros? It would certainly be a different world, full of orphanages jammed with Negros, robbed of a fair chance to grow up in a stable environment because of what some politician deemed moral in some oak-walled chamber on Capitol Hill.

Keep your laws off my plantation, America.

555 posted on 06/08/2003 9:47:34 AM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
So funny...I have always heard the counter-argument of "Who's going to care for all these unwanted babies??" as justification for abortion, as if we'd all be suddenly walking down streets congested w/ crying babies in every which way. I used to think maybe there was a point there -- after all, *I* wasn't signing up to adopt a child anytime soon. I thought that, until my sister found out her husband was impotent, and they decided to adopt a baby...3 years, and thousands and thousands of dollars later, sacrifices made, they finally were able to adopt a child. And there are thousands and thousands -- maybe hundreds of thousands -- of good, decent, loving parents who are dying for that baby that is about to die in the womb. But hey, those abortion doctors gotta pay the bills too -- it's a lucrative business -- that's what really drives it anyway.
619 posted on 06/11/2003 9:52:45 PM PDT by Proud2BAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson