No, Clint. You are wrong.
"The logic as per Ms. Hyperbole was that abortion causes cancer so don't do abortions, and that logic changed with little effort."
Clint.. the logic was always "Avoid getting cancer, it can kill you". That particular bit of logic is still sound, only you can't apply it in this situation because abortion may not be linked to cancer. It is NOT the only logical argument against cancer.
This isn't hard. You should be able to work it out.
Good so far
That particular bit of logic is still sound,
OK
only you can't apply it in this situation because abortion may not be linked to cancer.
Sorry, simple sophistry is still simple. Abortion IS linked to cancer. Logic by definition is reason or motive (a statement of justification) and in this case for NOT doing something, if the motive or reason changes then by its virtue the logic changes…you’ve simply reversed the definition to meet your own sophistry. Are you madg’s alter ego?
Nice try, but thanks or playing anyway. Did your professors actually teach you that bit of BS or are you just another casualty of liberal education?