To: bobwoodard
Yes, it is, but the first one was rated "R" because of violence. There might be a parent who would be tempted to take their younger one solely because of the first one.
I was fooled into thinking the second one would be like the first one content-wise. The poster of this thread wanted our opinions, I was giving it through a response to someone else.
The Wachowski brothers tried to fit more into that "R" rating, that's for sure.
158 posted on
05/23/2003 11:16:28 AM PDT by
scott7278
(Four more years! Four more years!)
To: scott7278
The Wachowski brothers tried to fit more into that "R" rating, that's for sure.A hard "R" vesus a soft "R", perhaps? It just struck me as odd that the existance and level of the violence was acceptable, while the addition of the sex was not. Each to their own? 8-)
Interestingly though, the W brothers didn't follow the normal plot device of exposing the female character more than the male character in a love scene, it seemed that they were careful to treat both charcters equally.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson