To: scott7278
The language was also coarser and more repetitious than the first. Definitely not for kids. Isn't that the point of an R rating?
To: bobwoodard
Yes, it is, but the first one was rated "R" because of violence. There might be a parent who would be tempted to take their younger one solely because of the first one.
I was fooled into thinking the second one would be like the first one content-wise. The poster of this thread wanted our opinions, I was giving it through a response to someone else.
The Wachowski brothers tried to fit more into that "R" rating, that's for sure.
158 posted on
05/23/2003 11:16:28 AM PDT by
scott7278
(Four more years! Four more years!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson