Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: conservativecorner
The title of the book about him says it all: "Al Franken is a buck toothed moron."
To: conservativecorner
To be a comedian, doesn't one have to be funny, or at least entertaining?
3 posted on
04/30/2003 6:13:44 AM PDT by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: conservativecorner
Wolfowitz was heard to reply with a suggestion that Franken commit a physical improbability. Not if it included his head and an orifice.
To: conservativecorner
Not to mention the fact that every third word out of this moron's mouth starts with an f and ends with a k.
5 posted on
04/30/2003 6:19:01 AM PDT by
Quilla
To: conservativecorner
As I recall, Congress authorized a large drawdown, at least among the Army in Europe to reflect the collapse of the Soviet threat. VII Corps fought the Gulf War and then went away; at one point 3ID had about 6-7 brigades as divisions were drawn down, returned to the US, or otherwise reshuffled. President Clin-ton, it seems to me, continued this policy.
But more to the immediate point of this article, if Al Franken is so damned smart, why isn't he in office?
6 posted on
04/30/2003 6:21:52 AM PDT by
Gefreiter
To: conservativecorner
Clinton cut combat army divisions from 18 to 10, combat fighter wings from 24 to 12, and intelligence gathering assets by 40%, along with 800,000 combat personnel, all while assigning troops to Rwanda, Haiti, Bosnia, Somalia, under dubious circumstances to do nothing but occupy. It was LBJ's war strategy for purely political image. Clinton loathed the military (what would you expect from a draft-dodger) and succeeded in decimating US national security.
To: conservativecorner
Al is a silly little man with silly little ideas and a stoopid face. Other than that he is useless.
8 posted on
04/30/2003 6:23:32 AM PDT by
Conspiracy Guy
(At Least I'm Relevent)
To: conservativecorner
He'd fail because he has no class. If you are going to argue/debate/discuss politics seriously, you must have a modicum of respect for the opposition. Limbaugh has been nothing if not respectful to individuals he encounters in person, regardless of their affiliation. He actually endured an encounter with Hillary!
9 posted on
04/30/2003 6:23:53 AM PDT by
Mr. Bird
To: conservativecorner
I think I remember reading that Franken also insulted Alan Colmes. Franken's problem is that he has the intellectual depth of my Yorkies, that is he has what he thinks of as convictions (but are really unexamined feelings), but no information, no sense of history and no principles.
13 posted on
04/30/2003 6:30:18 AM PDT by
3AngelaD
To: conservativecorner
What ever happened to this Al Franken radio show that was supposed to be so popular? Did it ever get off the ground? I live in Boston so this would be a natural place for it. If a liberal talk show can't make it in Boston, it probably can't make it anywhere. (Conservative talk radio rules even in Boston where we have local hosts like Jay Severin, Howie Carr and David Brudnoy.)
14 posted on
04/30/2003 6:30:39 AM PDT by
SamAdams76
(California wine beats French wine in blind taste tests. Boycott French wine.)
To: conservativecorner
How about Reagan's B-1 that delivered the coup de grace in Baghdad's al-Mansur district on April 7? You may remember that President Carter almost killed the B-1, but Reagan rescued it.
To: conservativecorner
Caller: Fine. OK, Ill accept that. Now, tell me why you keep calling the current economy Bushs economy. Isnt it true that the dot-com bust happened under Clinton? Isnt it true that the technology bust happened under Clinton? ....If its Clintons military, why isnt it Clintons economy?
....And that, my friends, is why liberals just cant handle talk radio!
I remember quite well that during the Clinton years, when the phoney economy was booming, Dems would often ask that the GOP talking heads at least give Bubba his props for that. Most times the talking heads would reply that the only reason the economy was soaring was because the GOP controlled both houses of congress.
With control, came congressional oversight powers, which the GOP failed to use as we were all too busy getting drunk on Dr.Koop's $180 a share exlixer.
Both parties (and our individual greed as well) were complicit in the great American swindle of the 90's. The GOP attempting to dis-own any responsibility for the 90's economy is ridiculous.
16 posted on
04/30/2003 6:34:46 AM PDT by
mr.pink
To: conservativecorner
Al Franken is an insulting jerk without an ounce of personality.
He is just a Nasty Liberal Leftist Looney without Manners.
20 posted on
04/30/2003 6:41:46 AM PDT by
chatham
To: conservativecorner
filthy mouthed punk...no wit..just filth...tirades...false accusations...panders to twits..
22 posted on
04/30/2003 6:42:48 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: conservativecorner
Al Franken is the Liberal savior as a talk host. He's the best they have. That's why they are in such a snit. Wouldn't you be if Al Franken was the best you could come up with?
24 posted on
04/30/2003 6:44:55 AM PDT by
FreePaul
To: conservativecorner
The people of Kuwait City are glad it wasn't Clinton's military. Clinton's military had mothballed the anti-missile system which, after the program was reinstated under Bush, proceeded to shoot down all but one Iraqi missile fired at them.
To: conservativecorner
And record enlistments right after 9/11, and record applications at the FBI right after 9/11.
To: conservativecorner
A liberal talk show would not include callers. Their ideas are so lofty that the little people would have to be "convinced".
It would be more like a Baptist preacher on the radio, callers would be a disruption to the sermon.
To: conservativecorner
Clinton's military was Wesley Clarke--from Waco to Serbia--and Clarke took orders from Hillary.
30 posted on
04/30/2003 6:53:16 AM PDT by
Poincare
((not a good time for a Frenchish screen name))
To: conservativecorner
I wish that the libs would face the truth. Without distortion, lies, deceipt (which many in our country unfortunately take as fact), from the libs and their media apologists, they would have nothing. That's why this will never succeed. Conservative causes can be defended with logical, moral, and level-headed arguments and facts. Liberals exist on lies/deceipt/distortion (i.e.- Bush cut Medicare when in fact it was a slowing in reduction, Hutchinon voted to cut school lunch, etc). When that doesn't have much traction, they always pull out the race card.
You can't defend the indefensible. At least, it can't be sustained for long. Thanks to the talk show hosts (Rush, Sean, even Savage to some degree, Coulter, etc), our message is getting out into the mainstream.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson