1 posted on
04/22/2003 3:20:24 AM PDT by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Here's what we have so far:
Here is the account of how the reporter came upon these documents:
I'm afraid that the establishment media will simply stonewall this to death, despite the direct revelation having been made by one of its most loyal members, the Daily Telegraph. The antiwar group ANSWER has been directly financed by the Iraqi regime since its formation, in the form of "legal fees" paid by Baghdad to ANSWER's leading spokesman and organizer, former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark.
While children are in the dungeon, this piece of dirt cries, "NO WAR".
The so-called Honourable Member for Glasgow Kelvin emerged last night as the paid mouthpiece for one of the most despicable regimes of torture and mass murder in modern times.
2 posted on
04/22/2003 3:26:36 AM PDT by
backhoe
(The 2000's will be forever known as "The Decade of Bribery...")
To: kattracks
Let the trial begin. It could be entertaining.:)
To: kattracks
The Telegraph must know that the documents, in and of themselves, do not constitute proof of Galloway's guilt. Because a conviction for libel is far easier to obtain in England that the US; because the Left will almost certainly rally unanimously behind Galloway, the Telegraph is almost certainly keeping a trump up their sleeve. The strategy is probably to force Galloway to sue; to get him on record categorically denying that he received payment before dropping the bomb. I would guess the Telegraph has Galloway's Swiss account number or other banking detail and will pin him to the wall with this.
4 posted on
04/22/2003 3:35:17 AM PDT by
wretchard
To: kattracks
Galloway is suing his accusers? Doesn't he remember what happened to Alger Hiss?
To: kattracks
Galloway, 48, said he had never, to his knowledge, met an Iraqi intelligence agent, and that the reported Boxing Day encounter never took place.
...
He met Saddam in Baghdad last year. Hmmmmm.
This is a convincing protestation of innocence?
Did what the Telegraph report actually happen?
Perhaps he should be suing the old Iraqi intelligence and foreign payments services.
That they would report payments not made would not surprise me. Sleep with dogs...
10 posted on
04/22/2003 4:30:43 AM PDT by
Publius6961
(Californians are as dumm as a sack of rocks)
To: kattracks
Galloway, a colourful member of parliament (MP) and one of the most outspoken critics of the war... Whoooo-Hooooo ... nothing like 'colourful' (sic) and 'outspoken' legislators to keep things interesting...
To: MadIvan
Galloway item--FYI
12 posted on
04/22/2003 5:54:13 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
To: kattracks
Remeber when it was asked in Parliament from whom they could accept an Iraqi surrender......and someone yelled out "Galloway". May not have been far off the mark.
13 posted on
04/22/2003 5:58:12 AM PDT by
knuthom
To: kattracks
He didn't get the money...directly. It went to his "charities" from which money he got...he must of! Check accounts in his wife's or others control in Jordan and West Bank.
14 posted on
04/22/2003 12:06:19 PM PDT by
Shermy
(Full disclosure of Food For Oil books...No Compromise!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson