Was there another way to take your question? It only made sense as a sarcasm. To answer it directly (which is more than you now deserve), I haven't changed at all. I believe in the rule of law and I support authority when it is in the right. When it is corrupt or abusive I condemn it with fury.
If he had acted in a respectful but firm manner and refused to answer their questions I would be backing him up. But he deliberately baited them. The antagonism in his counter questions was obvious to me and, as I said before, that is from HIS version of it. One can easily imagine how much of an ass he really was. Admitting to playing the race card surely blows his credibility.
So far you still haven't taken a crack at answering my questions in post #44.
If he was really concerned about suspicious objects in the park wouldn't he have immediately identified himself and layed out his suspicions to the first authority figure to come along? Wouldn't he have been actively seeking one out?
Instead he was evasive and antagonistic. What is a cop supposed to think when that is coupled with a report that he was photographing equipment and taking notes?