Law Professor urges UN to invade USA? Could U.N. use military force on U.S.?

www.worldnetdaily.com ^ | march 15,2003 | Art Moore

[Travis McGee]

Exactly. Where IS the U.N.?

[RightOnline]

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Someone needs to clue this pinhead in..........militarily, we ARE the UN. Financially, we ARE the UN.

Yep yep yep........bring on a coalition of forces from Salvador, the Ivory Coast, Botswana, and Malaysia, baby. We're quivering in our boots.

[TenthAmendmentChampion]

Was this guy a Satanist? I always think of Satanists of creeps like Aleister Crowley, but this gave me shivers!

[oldtimer]

I am glad that I don't have to think about my liabilities with a Concealed Gun Permit when it comes to Ratner (he is a couple of thousand miles from me)and, is a traitor to his country.

So many civilisations have gone away throughout history because of pieces of dog clinton like this guy.

[UnBlinkingEye]

Can't wait for the U.N. to declare war on the U.S.

No need, our political class has already declared war on the Constitution, the Republicrats vote yes.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

the General Assembly to step in when the Security Council is at an impasse in the face of a "threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression."

After 2000 Hillary muttered all sorts of imprecations about the Electoral College, which wouldn't have elected Bush/Cheney if not for the 2-elector bonus each state receives merely for being a state--thereby giving Bush a 2-electoral-vote boost for each state, no matter how small, that he won--and he won most of the lightly populated ones.

If Hillary thinks THAT is undemocratic (it is), what about the General Assembly of the UN, which has one vote per nation, be that nation China or Fiji?! The governance of the UN is wildly undemocratic, which is I suppose why the "Democratic" Party is in favor of ceding US sovereignty to it. Elitists to a gal!

[Indy Pendance]

I'm getting to this thread really late. I still have to read this thread, and please forgive me if this has been said, but there are provisions provided for the exact situation we are up against. So, I will read all 200+ comments and hope this has been brought up.

Here's my research which found the following:

UN Security Council, General Assembly United for Peace Loophole!

Long ago, the members of the United Nations recognized that such impasses would occur in the Security Council. They set up a procedure for insuring that such stalemates would not prevent the United Nations from carrying out its mission to “maintain international peace and security.” In 1950, the United Nations by an almost unanimous vote adopted Resolution 377, the wonderfully named “Uniting for Peace.” The United States played an important role in that resolutions adoption, concerned about the possibilities of vetoes by the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

Uniting for Peace provides that if, because of the lack of unanimity of the permanent members of the Security Council (France, China, Russia, Britain, United States), the Council cannot maintain international peace where there is a “threat to the peace, breach of the peace or act of aggression,” the General Assembly “shall consider the matter immediately….” The General Assembly can meet within 24 hours to consider such a matter, and can recommend collective measures to U.N. members including the use of armed forces to “maintain or restore international peace and security.”

[Dalite]

Blue Helmets make Good Targets. Everyone be sure to bag the daily limit. Remember, some nations will never have the chance, and bagging less than the daily limit will looked upon as not taking advantage of "targets of opportunity" in the future historical account of the sporting event.

[Carry_Okie]

There are those who say Pike was a Luciferian. There are those who regard that characterization of him as the exclusive product of the "Taxil Hoax." Frankly, there is so much contortion of the Bible in Pike's book, Morals and Dogma, that the Masonic explanation (that the charge is the sole product of a hoax) is itself dishonest.

[concerned about politics]

This law professor is advocating going outside the US governmetn in order to enforce his views on US citizens.

These people don't want the Pledge of Allegience eliminated because the word "God" is used in it, it's a distraction.
They want the part that says "and to the REPUBLIC, from witch it stands" to be censored.
This is another example of left wing facism through litigation.

[concerned about politics]

The left is also TERRIFIED, literally, that this pro-American action would be a huge success. They know the Iraqi people want to taste the sweet nector of freedom, something the dictorial left would want to keep them hidden from forever if they could.
Securing the US, giving those who support a free Republic a PR victory, and allowing freedom in Iraq is something they would kill (US citizens, if necessary) to stop.

[Porterville]

Awesome; I would love to see them try; I hate them everyday a little worse...Maybe we can go to war against france and the UN

[Tax Government]

Any lawyer advocating the forceful overthrow of the government should be disbarred. Any law school that fails to discipline a professor in this situation should lose its accreditation.

It's up to us to push this point home; everybody else will just ignore the problem unless people like us make a stink. Let's come back to this individual later, and ensure that justice happens.

[CARepubGal]

10 million deer rifle army ping!

[meema]

I'm with you. We paid for this guy's education????
Surely his 'plan' amounts to treason!

[bart99]

I'm reading all this late too, but here's what got me.... the quote

"I've done a lot of work with international law and with the U.N.," he said, "and we're always interested in figuring out ways to make the U.N. more important."

"More important?" How about more functional? How about more reasonable? How about still recognizing the sovereinty of each country? How about "no vetos" before a resolution is submitted? Geeshhhhhhh

[TShaunK]

Yeah, and France will be right behind them...Go ahead make my day!

[concerned about politics]

"Below you will find an excellent and urgently needed proposal for stopping the war before it starts from the Center for Constitutional Rights. …"

Constitutional rights give the UN the right to oppress us? What does the UN have to do with Americas Constitutional rights? Under the Constitution, we're a free Republic, not a part of the socialist collective.
The socialist left is TERRIFIED the world will learn to accept freedom, rather than total government rule. They're literally terrified Iraq would be a huge success.

[CARepubGal]

Limit? The Texans will take out each and every one of the critters. Leftovers have to get through NM, AZ and CA (they will have problems here since they have to get through the Inland Empire/San Bernadino, San Diego & Orange Counties to reach LA. Red Dawn is a very instructive film......

[CyberCowboy777]

obviously france would make up the brute force of the invasion < /sarcasm >