Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US officials fear nuclear attack by al-Qaeda
Atlanta Journal Constitution ^ | 3/14/03 | Knight Ridder News Service

Posted on 03/14/2003 2:48:58 PM PST by Angelus Errare

U.S. officials fear nuclear attack by al-Qaida Search for bin Laden takes on new urgency

Knight-Ridder News Service

WASHINGTON -- The manhunt for Osama bin Laden has become more urgent because of growing fears among intelligence officials that he is obsessed with building a nuclear bomb to explode on U.S. soil.

Federal intelligence and energy officials worry that bin Laden's terrorists will build an improvised nuclear weapon and smuggle it into the U.S., possibly in a container ship, according to well-placed sources.

His goal, they believe, is a nuclear hellstorm like the 1945 Hiroshima blast that killed 140,000 Japanese.

Unlike smaller-scale attacks, which can be planned and authorized by lower-level leaders, the chain of command in al-Qaida's nuke project answers directly to Bin Laden, right-hand man Ayman Al-Zawahiri and an unidentified scientist called "Dr. X," the sources said.

Alarming new statements by a top al-Qaida lieutenant -- in U.S. custody for the past year -- add to evidence of Bin Laden's doomsday bomb ambition.

On Feb. 2, captured al-Qaida planner Abu Zubaydah was asked what type of "new" attack would "surprise" America.

"Zubaydah's first response was nuclear, although he has continually stated that he does not believe that al-Qaida acquired nuclear weapons," said a secret Feb. 19 intelligence bulletin obtained by the New York Daily News.

Some in government suspect al-Qaida has a secret nuclear-bomb lab in Sudan, Pakistan or Yemen. Other officials doubt it.

The CIA says no specific nuclear plot has been uncovered, but one U.S. official described bin Laden's bomb lust as "on our screen for a long time."

"It is clear that al-Qaida is moving in that direction amidst obstacles," said British terrorism expert Rohan Kumar Gunaratna, author of "Inside Al Qaeda."

The furtherance of bin Laden's nuclear ambitions has alarmed others outside the intelligence community.

"The greatest danger we face is a nuclear bomb being smuggled into this country," said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. "The amazing thing is how little we're doing about it."

"The probability of us stopping a bomb from being smuggled into the U.S., unfortunately, is small," said Matthew Bunn, a Harvard University nuclear terrorism expert who co-wrote a report on the threat released Wednesday by Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

Though difficult for terrorists to build, a nuclear bomb detonated inside Grand Central Terminal would vaporize a half-million New Yorkers, the report said.

Sources say al-Qaida has tried to recruit disgruntled nuclear scientists overseas, particularly in Pakistan, where nine scientists were reported missing last January.

"One of the great worries is that the Pakistani nuclear core is infiltrated by Taliban and al-Qaida," Schumer said.

The United States, through its allies, has bought off some foreign nuclear scientists and jailed others, the sources said.

Pakistan insists it keeps tabs on nuclear experts. "Their whereabouts are observed and their travel is observed," a Pakistani official told the New York Daily News.

He pointed to Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood, the fired chief of Pakistan's plutonium energy project, who was jailed for a year after U.S. intelligence grew suspicious of him in 2001. Mahmood later admitted he twice met with bin Laden and Al-Zawahiri about nuclear-bomb production.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: swarthyguy
I would argue that Saudi Arabia is the nexus of terror, actually.

Pakistan strikes me as being the clearing house, but without Saudi funding most of these guys would never have achieved the level of sophistication they have today.
21 posted on 03/14/2003 4:00:51 PM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
The manhunt for Osama bin Laden has become more urgent because of growing fears among intelligence officials that he is obsessed with building a nuclear bomb to explode on U.S. soil.

So does this mean his status is back on "alive"? I'm so glad that W was saying a while back that he didn't consider catching Osama to be all that important. Well, at least he's passing another PATRIOT act to spy on us. I guess that makes up for it.

22 posted on 03/14/2003 4:01:54 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
Yes, you're right, I'll go back to an older phase, the Pakistanis are the Lapdogs of the Saudis --the unrepentant cashbox of jihad, as one writer put it.

ClearingHouse is good; bringing the benefits of a state apparatus in the service of jihadis.




23 posted on 03/14/2003 4:06:48 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Somebody needs to say it and KEEP saying it until the governmental officials 'get' it---They can't terrorize us with anything if they ARE NOT HERE! Not a one of them. All illegals, all Muslims period.
If the bubonic plague had been fought like terrorism, we would have examined rats one by one so only the 'guilty' were destroyed. Excuse me?! If the evil emanates from Islam this country will NEVER be safe until Islam is banished as a subversive and terrorist 'religion'.
Who are the terrorists? Where are the terrorists who would nuke us from within? Look around- at your local mosques, behind the counters of convenience stores- smiling, pretending- just as the perpetrators of 9-11 did.
It does little good to destroy terrorists on the other side of the planet if we don't start with the ones right here.
24 posted on 03/14/2003 4:11:43 PM PST by ClearBlueSky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bootless
FR originates from California. And so do I, and my son, and my mom. I'm SO tired of this autoresponse.

Now look me in the eye and deny that there isn't at least one spot in California that you'd like to see vaporized.

25 posted on 03/14/2003 4:23:20 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
"Yes, you're right, I'll go back to an older phase, the Pakistanis are the Lapdogs of the Saudis --the unrepentant cashbox of jihad, as one writer put it."

That is my assessment as well. I wonder if the ISI has figured out yet that as far as their fundraisers are concerned, they're just pawns in a larger struggle.
26 posted on 03/14/2003 4:49:38 PM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
Some think the war will start this weekend and Bush has flown to the Azores. Wonder if they are worried about his being in DC?
27 posted on 03/14/2003 5:25:03 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: inquest
I'm so glad that W was saying a while back that he didn't consider catching Osama to be all that important.

I'll be quite impressed if you can come up with that quote.

28 posted on 03/14/2003 7:17:51 PM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Now look me in the eye and deny that there isn't at least one spot in California that you'd like to see vaporized.

:-)

29 posted on 03/14/2003 8:43:01 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
bump
30 posted on 03/14/2003 9:47:16 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
bump
31 posted on 03/15/2003 4:34:17 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
From Reuters (almost exactly one year ago, interestingly enough):

Bush pointed out that lately he "hadn't heard much" from bin Laden who, in the past, has been seen on videotape and said he did not believe the Saudi exile was "at the center of any command structure."

"I truly am not that concerned about him ... I was concerned about him when he had taken over a country, I was concerned about the fact that he was basically running Afghanistan and calling the shots for the Taliban."

32 posted on 03/15/2003 12:20:05 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Good try, but that's not really the same as:

I'm so glad that W was saying a while back that he didn't consider catching Osama to be all that important.

The man keeps a scorecard in his desk. While he's right to take some emphasis off of Bin Laden (to keep the "war is failing" crowd quiet), Bush also said "dead or alive" related to OBL. Neutralizing this coward is certainly important to President Bush, not to mention the rest of America.

33 posted on 03/15/2003 2:54:33 PM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Coop
"Truly not that concerned about him" isn't the same as considering him not all that important? You may believe that he didn't mean what he said, but that doesn't change the fact that he said it. Was it just strategery? I don't know. To me, it at least raises questions about how serious he is about catching him - or about anything else he purports to care about, for that matter.
34 posted on 03/15/2003 4:21:32 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: bootless; YOMO
That exchange between you guys makes me proud.
36 posted on 03/15/2003 5:02:39 PM PST by GopherIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: inquest
As I suspected, you're just carrying a serious case of indigestion relating to President Bush in general, and you're using one vague comment to try to make your point. So be it. But I'm not interested in what you're selling.
37 posted on 03/15/2003 7:27:14 PM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I've presented hard facts and drawn the evident conclusions. It seems to be you who's allowed your political prejudices to get in the way of seeing the plain facts in front of you.
38 posted on 03/16/2003 11:57:54 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: inquest
I guess I am having problems seeing, because nothing resembling "hard facts" appeared on any of your posts.
39 posted on 03/16/2003 12:56:26 PM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Coop
That's OK. Most other people can see it and judge it for what it's worth.
40 posted on 03/16/2003 12:59:35 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson