Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US officials fear nuclear attack by al-Qaeda
Atlanta Journal Constitution ^ | 3/14/03 | Knight Ridder News Service

Posted on 03/14/2003 2:48:58 PM PST by Angelus Errare

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: swarthyguy
I would argue that Saudi Arabia is the nexus of terror, actually.

Pakistan strikes me as being the clearing house, but without Saudi funding most of these guys would never have achieved the level of sophistication they have today.
21 posted on 03/14/2003 4:00:51 PM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
The manhunt for Osama bin Laden has become more urgent because of growing fears among intelligence officials that he is obsessed with building a nuclear bomb to explode on U.S. soil.

So does this mean his status is back on "alive"? I'm so glad that W was saying a while back that he didn't consider catching Osama to be all that important. Well, at least he's passing another PATRIOT act to spy on us. I guess that makes up for it.

22 posted on 03/14/2003 4:01:54 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
Yes, you're right, I'll go back to an older phase, the Pakistanis are the Lapdogs of the Saudis --the unrepentant cashbox of jihad, as one writer put it.

ClearingHouse is good; bringing the benefits of a state apparatus in the service of jihadis.




23 posted on 03/14/2003 4:06:48 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Somebody needs to say it and KEEP saying it until the governmental officials 'get' it---They can't terrorize us with anything if they ARE NOT HERE! Not a one of them. All illegals, all Muslims period.
If the bubonic plague had been fought like terrorism, we would have examined rats one by one so only the 'guilty' were destroyed. Excuse me?! If the evil emanates from Islam this country will NEVER be safe until Islam is banished as a subversive and terrorist 'religion'.
Who are the terrorists? Where are the terrorists who would nuke us from within? Look around- at your local mosques, behind the counters of convenience stores- smiling, pretending- just as the perpetrators of 9-11 did.
It does little good to destroy terrorists on the other side of the planet if we don't start with the ones right here.
24 posted on 03/14/2003 4:11:43 PM PST by ClearBlueSky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bootless
FR originates from California. And so do I, and my son, and my mom. I'm SO tired of this autoresponse.

Now look me in the eye and deny that there isn't at least one spot in California that you'd like to see vaporized.

25 posted on 03/14/2003 4:23:20 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
"Yes, you're right, I'll go back to an older phase, the Pakistanis are the Lapdogs of the Saudis --the unrepentant cashbox of jihad, as one writer put it."

That is my assessment as well. I wonder if the ISI has figured out yet that as far as their fundraisers are concerned, they're just pawns in a larger struggle.
26 posted on 03/14/2003 4:49:38 PM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
Some think the war will start this weekend and Bush has flown to the Azores. Wonder if they are worried about his being in DC?
27 posted on 03/14/2003 5:25:03 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: inquest
I'm so glad that W was saying a while back that he didn't consider catching Osama to be all that important.

I'll be quite impressed if you can come up with that quote.

28 posted on 03/14/2003 7:17:51 PM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Now look me in the eye and deny that there isn't at least one spot in California that you'd like to see vaporized.

:-)

29 posted on 03/14/2003 8:43:01 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
bump
30 posted on 03/14/2003 9:47:16 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
bump
31 posted on 03/15/2003 4:34:17 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
From Reuters (almost exactly one year ago, interestingly enough):

Bush pointed out that lately he "hadn't heard much" from bin Laden who, in the past, has been seen on videotape and said he did not believe the Saudi exile was "at the center of any command structure."

"I truly am not that concerned about him ... I was concerned about him when he had taken over a country, I was concerned about the fact that he was basically running Afghanistan and calling the shots for the Taliban."

32 posted on 03/15/2003 12:20:05 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Good try, but that's not really the same as:

I'm so glad that W was saying a while back that he didn't consider catching Osama to be all that important.

The man keeps a scorecard in his desk. While he's right to take some emphasis off of Bin Laden (to keep the "war is failing" crowd quiet), Bush also said "dead or alive" related to OBL. Neutralizing this coward is certainly important to President Bush, not to mention the rest of America.

33 posted on 03/15/2003 2:54:33 PM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Coop
"Truly not that concerned about him" isn't the same as considering him not all that important? You may believe that he didn't mean what he said, but that doesn't change the fact that he said it. Was it just strategery? I don't know. To me, it at least raises questions about how serious he is about catching him - or about anything else he purports to care about, for that matter.
34 posted on 03/15/2003 4:21:32 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: bootless; YOMO
That exchange between you guys makes me proud.
36 posted on 03/15/2003 5:02:39 PM PST by GopherIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: inquest
As I suspected, you're just carrying a serious case of indigestion relating to President Bush in general, and you're using one vague comment to try to make your point. So be it. But I'm not interested in what you're selling.
37 posted on 03/15/2003 7:27:14 PM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I've presented hard facts and drawn the evident conclusions. It seems to be you who's allowed your political prejudices to get in the way of seeing the plain facts in front of you.
38 posted on 03/16/2003 11:57:54 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: inquest
I guess I am having problems seeing, because nothing resembling "hard facts" appeared on any of your posts.
39 posted on 03/16/2003 12:56:26 PM PST by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Coop
That's OK. Most other people can see it and judge it for what it's worth.
40 posted on 03/16/2003 12:59:35 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson