Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea threatens to attack US! (Using ICBM to hit US West Coast!)
The Age - Australia ^ | 3-8-2003 | By Shane Green

Posted on 03/13/2003 2:10:09 PM PST by vannrox

North Korea threatens to attack US
By Shane Green
Tokyo
March 8 2003

North Korea would launch a ballistic missile attack on the United States if Washington made a pre-emptive strike against the communist state's nuclear plant, the man described as Pyongyang's "unofficial spokesman" said yesterday.

Kim Myong-chol, who has links to the Stalinist regime, told foreign reporters in Tokyo that a US strike on the nuclear plant at Yongbyon "means nuclear war".

"If American forces carry out a pre-emptive strike on the Yongbyon facility, North Korea will immediately target, carry the war to the US mainland," he said, claiming that New York, Washington and Chicago would be "aflame".

A pre-emptive US strike on Yongbyon is one of the strategic scenarios in the crisis over North Korea's nuclear arms program. The US has deployed 24 long-range bombers to the Pacific base of Guam capable of launching such a strike.

Mr Kim, who has written a text studied by North Korean military and political leaders, predicted that Pyongyang would restart a reprocessing plant to make weapons-grade plutonium this month.

A nuclear weapon would be produced by the end of April, with another five produced by the end of the year. This was on top of a suspected nuclear arsenal of 100 weapons.

The ultimate aim of North Korean leader Kim Jong-il was the "neutralisation of the American factor" in the region, Mr Kim said.

This would be achieved by striking a non-aggression pact with the US, or becoming an official nuclear power, thereby making the US nuclear umbrella in the region irrelevant. "Both ways, Kim Jong-il is a winner," he said.

"By the end of the year, I predict Bush will be in Pyongyang suing for peace," he said.

While his comments are extreme, they match the heated and belligerent rhetoric of North Korea, which has previously warned of nuclear war and turning the cities of its enemies into a "sea of ashes".

The Bush Administration yesterday made renewed calls on China and other countries in the region to help broker a solution to the crisis.

In a televised news conference, Mr Bush said North Korea's nuclear arms program was a regional issue. "I say regional because there's a lot of countries that have got a direct stake into whether or not North Korea has nuclear weapons," Mr Bush said.

"China clearly has a stake as to whether or not North Korea has a nuclear weapon."

The Bush Administration is pushing for multilateral talks with North Korea, while Pyongyang wants direct talks with Washington.

US Secretary of State Colin Powell told a US Senate committee: "We have a number of diplomatic initiatives under way, some of them very, very quietly under way, to see if we cannot get a multilateral dialogue started."

Yesterday, the US also flagged the possible withdrawal of its 37,000 troops from South Korea, part of the rethink of a deployment in place since the end of the Korean War in 1953.

US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said the US was consulting South Korea and he suspected "we'll end up making some adjustments there".

"Whether the forces come home or whether they will move further south of the (Korean) peninsula or whether to some neighbouring area are the kinds of things that are being sorted out," he said at a meeting in Germany.

This story was found at: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/03/07/1046826530206.html


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: attack; ballistic; battle; crazy; defense; icbm; korea; missle; north; northkorea; nuclear; ship; terror; threats; war; yongbyon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: vannrox
I wonder if the demonrats understand the need for missile defense now?
21 posted on 03/13/2003 2:27:36 PM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Who needs the west coast anyway?
22 posted on 03/13/2003 2:28:02 PM PST by Ham Hock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shadowman99
Reagan's star wars was a monumental failure. It spawned some neat tech, true, but given it's primary purpose all it did was swallow a lot of cash.
23 posted on 03/13/2003 2:28:25 PM PST by Stavka2 (Setting the record straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
I wonder if all those Peaceniks who were agaisnt the Missile Defense System want to rethink their postion now?

Of course not. Because all liberals know that these loony totalitarian dictators can all be "reasoned" with if we will only open a "dialogue." No crazy dictator would actually start a war (unless the U.S. unreasonably threatens them).

24 posted on 03/13/2003 2:30:11 PM PST by Earl B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
"By the end of the year, I predict Bush will be in Pyongyang suing for peace," he said.

Be prepared to break out the kimshe? It's disgusting, but any port in a storm. LOL
25 posted on 03/13/2003 2:31:05 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
Would any nuclear armed country with a delivery means accept any such attack without a nuclear strike in return?

We would attack using conventional weapons. If they responded with nuclear weapons, we'd turn them into a steaming slag heap.

26 posted on 03/13/2003 2:32:32 PM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
Reagan's star wars was a monumental failure. It spawned some neat tech, true, but given it's primary purpose all it did was swallow a lot of cash.

As far as you know.

27 posted on 03/13/2003 2:33:34 PM PST by Earl B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ham Hock
Who needs the west coast anyway?

As long as it hits Seattle, San Francisco, or Hollywood I'm not sure I'd be too upset. I'd say Portland too but that's a little close for comfort.(/sarcasm)
28 posted on 03/13/2003 2:33:37 PM PST by Tailback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
You are mistaken. It worked perfectly.
29 posted on 03/13/2003 2:34:40 PM PST by e_engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MatthewViti
What is the matter with Bush? Why won't he just take care of N. Korea once and for all, as he doesn't seem to be working on Iraq any longer. (Just my opinion)

I am really tired of hearing this kind of DemoncRAT stupidity being proffered. First of all, why don't people remember the threats North Korea periodically throws around EVERY TIME the US appears distracted with something else. They do this for several purposes, one being their attempts to blackmail US at a time when we're most vulnerable, another is to distract the US from protecting our interests and, lastly, like the DemoncRATs themselves, they're interested in weakening Bush in any way they can. The best way to deal with North Korea at this point in time is TO FINISH IRAQ. First that demonstration of power is not only designed to "shock & awe" the Iraqi's, it's designed to "impress" the North Koreans as well. Remember, North Korea has largely armed itself from the same merchants, Russia, China & France, that Iraq has and they need another reminder - ala 91 Gulf War - of what they're truly up against. The second thing addressing Iraq does is demonstrate US resolve in the face of mounting pressures from anti-US forces, including the French and North Korea. Everybody is looking and the last thing we need when dealing with North Korea is to blink, as the North Koreans and the DemoncRATs themselves are urging Bush & the US to do. Lastly, this whole argument is absurd because we ARE dealing with North Korea - we're moving armaments around, continuing surveillance flights with guards and are engaged behind the scenes both diplomatically and, undoubtedly, covertly, as well.

30 posted on 03/13/2003 2:35:12 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ham Hock
ummmm I need the westcoast... since I live here? :P
31 posted on 03/13/2003 2:36:13 PM PST by ProudArmyWife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
Reagan's star wars was a monumental failure. It spawned some neat tech, true, but given it's primary purpose all it did was swallow a lot of cash.

It also happened to break the back of the USSR .... so I don't call it much of a failure.

32 posted on 03/13/2003 2:36:15 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Take charge of your destiny, or someone else will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ham Hock
Who needs the west coast anyway?

I'm surprised it took until #22!

Let's just hope it hits within 35 miles of the coast, and that the Santa Anas are blowing(east to west).....then Kalifornia would be pretty much back in the conservative Red Zone.

33 posted on 03/13/2003 2:36:24 PM PST by ErnBatavia ((Bumperootus!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
No kidding. If one Commie has too much spotlight, the others get jealous and try to shout louder and act out to get attention! It shows what these people are really made of.......pure ego....
34 posted on 03/13/2003 2:37:57 PM PST by BossLady (I went to France and all I got was a lousy croussant.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Not to worry, I heard the President say that North Korea was a "regional problem", I'm sure the countries of that region will handle it.
35 posted on 03/13/2003 2:38:28 PM PST by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
This is old news. Since the threat was issued last week N Kor has demonstrated neither a missile with the range, nor a nuke. Idle talk.
36 posted on 03/13/2003 2:38:54 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
""By the end of the year, I predict Bush will be in Pyongyang suing for peace," he said."

I have a far better prediction, Mr. Kim.

I predict that, by the end of the year, PRESIDENT Bush will be so fed up with you little insects that he trains the might of the most powerful fighting force on the face of the planet.........in all recorded history...........onto your slimy-assed little country and........just............eradicates you.

Problem solved.

......and there's not a go**amned thing you can do about it.

37 posted on 03/13/2003 2:40:52 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
They live in a world that is the Liberal utopia.
Reality is whatever the leader says it is.
38 posted on 03/13/2003 2:42:31 PM PST by Darksheare (Quickly flip the switch and watch the pretty colors, of the pyrotechnics of my heart exploding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouD
Let me ask you this: how many Americans would be calling for a nuclear response if another nation attacked a US nuclear facility with conventional weapons?
39 posted on 03/13/2003 2:43:43 PM PST by Stavka2 (Setting the record straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"North Korea would launch a ballistic missile attack on the United States if Washington made a pre-emptive strike against the communist state's nuclear plant, the man described as Pyongyang's "unofficial spokesman" said yesterday."

It's a little late for a pre-emptive strike now. We had our chance, before they restarted the damn thing.

40 posted on 03/13/2003 2:44:00 PM PST by fightu4it (allyourbasearebelongtous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson