Sorry, it just won't scan. One parallel, sure, you can deny that, two, accidental, three, too vague, four, apples and oranges, five, and six, and seven, and more...I don't think you have a case, and insulting phrases such as "amateur psychology" are nothing more than the bluster of someone who knows it.
Read the source material and get back to me.
The question is how those 'parallels' are linguistically constructed. Without a certain framing they aren't parallels at all, but, alternatively, random events in unrelated narratives and causality spheres......
I can 'frame' the Founding Fathers to sound like terrorist revolutionaries and murderers of all that is decent. Go back and read the British dispatches of the time, they did it....
What was the 'truth'?