David Frum's response to Pat Buchanan. The truth's gonna leave a mark.
1 posted on
03/12/2003 8:32:08 AM PST by
hchutch
To: Poohbah; Miss Marple; section9; Dog; Howlin; PhiKapMom; Luis Gonzalez; mhking; rdb3; JohnHuang2; ...
FYI ping.
2 posted on
03/12/2003 8:35:16 AM PST by
hchutch
("Last suckers crossed, Syndicate shot'em up" - Ice-T, "I'm Your Pusher")
To: hchutch
Buchanen has been anti-semitic for a long time. Apparently, Nixon shared that anti-semitism given his recently revealed comments to Billy Graham. Billy repented of his anti-semitic words spoken to curry favor with Nixon.
Fortunately, Nixon was a Rino (read: liberal who imposed price controls) and no conservative.
True conservatives don't hold race, color, religion against a person. They know that each have been endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.
3 posted on
03/12/2003 8:37:51 AM PST by
xzins
(Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
To: hchutch
This is a world-class bitch-slap to Buchanan.
4 posted on
03/12/2003 8:38:09 AM PST by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: hchutch
Pat's JAccuse = J'Ihad
Muslamos have a smile on their faces today and will be copying and pasting Pat's "J'Ihad" onto their websites
5 posted on
03/12/2003 8:39:38 AM PST by
dennisw
( http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
To: hchutch
Good for Frum. I have book marked to use whenever one of Bucky Buck Wheat's legions attack our president.
We charge that a cabal of writers who misuse the title of conservatives are rallying to defend an Iraqi dictator who has waged war on American allies, attempted to assassinate an American president, fired on American aircraft, and who is now arming to threaten Americans with mass murder.
We charge them with making common cause with left-wing radicals and radical Islamists, former communists and other people who hate the United States all in order to prematurely halt the war on terror and preserve the Iraqi dictators rule.
We charge them with forgetting George Washingtons warning in his Farewell Address against habitual hatred for any nation and instead allowing their unreasoning loathing of the Jewish state to lead them into what Washington condemned as a passionate attachment to Baathist Iraq.
We charge them with disregarding their wartime duty to lay aside their prejudices and resentments for the sake of the common good. We charge them with attempting to undermine a conservative Republican president in a moment of national emergency. We charge them with acting as excuse-makers for Americas enemies. We charge them with failing to put America first.
6 posted on
03/12/2003 8:40:59 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: SJackson; Yehuda; veronica; dennisw
You may want read and then bookmark David Frum's article for use with those who hate Israel/Jews and our president and wrap themselves in pseudo conservative names.
We charge that a cabal of writers who misuse the title of conservatives are rallying to defend an Iraqi dictator who has waged war on American allies, attempted to assassinate an American president, fired on American aircraft, and who is now arming to threaten Americans with mass murder.
We charge them with making common cause with left-wing radicals and radical Islamists, former communists and other people who hate the United States all in order to prematurely halt the war on terror and preserve the Iraqi dictators rule.
We charge them with forgetting George Washingtons warning in his Farewell Address against habitual hatred for any nation and instead allowing their unreasoning loathing of the Jewish state to lead them into what Washington condemned as a passionate attachment to Baathist Iraq.
We charge them with disregarding their wartime duty to lay aside their prejudices and resentments for the sake of the common good. We charge them with attempting to undermine a conservative Republican president in a moment of national emergency. We charge them with acting as excuse-makers for Americas enemies. We charge them with failing to put America first.
8 posted on
03/12/2003 8:45:47 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: hchutch
Sean Hannity fielded a nutcase call on last night's radio show. Hannity called the guy anti-Semitic and said he needed a shrink.
But Hannity sort of botched the whole thing when he said that Buchanan does not hold the views which the caller has. Evidently, Buchanan does hold those very views.
18 posted on
03/12/2003 8:56:38 AM PST by
the_doc
To: hchutch
You had to go to a Canadian to get a response?
You Wilsonians need to get your own board.
22 posted on
03/12/2003 9:00:39 AM PST by
JohnGalt
To: hchutch
It was disappointing to see how many poster here supported Buchanan and were totally blind to his fatal shortcomings. The GOP has done much better without him. If Buchanan is considered to be a Conservative, then Conservatism is in deep trouble.
25 posted on
03/12/2003 9:13:14 AM PST by
Consort
To: hchutch
"We charge them with colluding with Israel to ignite those wars and destroy the Oslo Accords." Hooray!
"We charge them with deliberately damaging U.S. relations with every state in the Arab world"... What relations?
..."that defies Israel or supports the Palestinian peoples right to a homeland of their own." Halleleujah!!!
"We charge that they have alienated friends and allies all over the Islamic and Western world through their arrogance, hubris, and bellicosity.
Whatever it takes! With friends like Jacques Chirac and King Faisal who needs enemies? Let's start shooting and keep on shooting until not one voice is raised against us.
31 posted on
03/12/2003 9:40:50 AM PST by
TigersEye
(Let the liberals whine - it's what they do.)
To: hchutch
Pat should put some ice on that.
32 posted on
03/12/2003 10:03:28 AM PST by
ellery
To: hchutch
This is from Bob Novack's review of Frums book. You'll note the mocking tone Frum has for Bush as well as his belief in man made climate change. Do you read any Conservatives or just leftists?
For much of this book, Frum seems disengaged from Bushs policies. He refers to the presidents energy plan fiasco, calling it an incoherent mess and a pseudoscandal. He contends Bush could never quite bring himself to deny that climate change was very likely real and man-made. He says of Bushs faith-based initiative, instead of drawing new people to the Republican Party, it had repelled them. Prior to Sept. 11, 2001, writes Frum,
"I began avoiding parties where I expected the questions [of Bushs capacity for the presidency] to be posed too persistently by conservative friends, for I was not sure I would know how to answer."
47 posted on
03/12/2003 1:17:04 PM PST by
JohnGalt
To: hchutch
Hey Pat! Look out behind you! It's the JOOS.
66 posted on
03/12/2003 7:45:08 PM PST by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: stevejackson; DPB101; nopardons; HISSKGB
bttt
Relevant to the Eskimo thread.
77 posted on
07/07/2003 9:42:25 PM PDT by
1rudeboy
To: hchutch
I am so truly embarassed that I ever defended Buchanan's performance at the 1992 convention--it was the beginning of the end for Bush. I am embarassed I ever gave any of his television appearances the time of day. Without doubt, he contributed to the election of Clinton and the ensuing smut those two terms brought.
Buchanan is a kook--and a hateful one at that. He's a Mercedes-driving elitest who fed class-envy among union supporters. He's a childless man dictating other people's reproduction rights and responsibilities and how they should raise their children. He demonstrates all the micro-managing, hypocritical traits that make liberals so intolerant, contradictory, and unpleasant. And he's not even funny, or pleasant, or particularly good looking.
Bye-bye Buchanan byline.
78 posted on
07/07/2003 9:51:05 PM PDT by
MHT
To: hchutch
Just for the record the persecutors and prosecutors of Dryfus were the French Army which at the time of the Republic enjoyed immense popularity, gravitas and officer worship by the French population. Dryfus was accused falsly of spying as a cover up for the true espionage. Convicted and sent to Devil's Island. Zola secured a second trial for him, he was convicted again with time served, but the French turned the blood lust of defending the Army against Zola. The French have always been a bit peculiar.
The artistic intelligensia was having it's say and socialistic communism was on the wind in Europe at that time and the Soviets were warming up their Russian takeover.
The Worker's revolt was on the march!
79 posted on
07/07/2003 10:11:39 PM PDT by
wingnuts'nbolts
(I still hate all things Clinton!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson