[William McKinley]

Oh no, you didn't propose, even by implication, ANY conspiracy theory.

Funny how the Serb PM was killed just s he started to call for the re-assertion of Serbian authority in Kosovo?? In the end he made too many enemies--the last enemy he made was NATO.

Not at all.

He just made too many enemies, and the last enemy was NATO. Now he's dead. But you weren't proposing or implying anything, no siree Bob.

I really, really hate people that don't even have the guts to say what they are saying.

[Destro]

imply is not the same as propose. Oh by the way assasinations of Prime Ministers are usually conspiracies..unless it's a lone gunman.

[norton]

Try this one on:

SOMEBODY obviously shot the guy..agreed.
NATO conducted a war on Serbia/Yugoslavia that created what most of us would agree is an islamist cess-pool today administered by a bloated herd of NATO/EU/US Allies...Correct.
"The former Yugoslavia", now even diminished from that status, has been shredded and beaten, its former president kidnapped and put on trial, and up to now Djindjic has been pretty compliant...no trouble to those who destroyed 'his' country and realigned the Balkans ('good puppy').
Djindjic (a creep and a traitor in my opinion) had recently made some moves toward reasserting Serb presence in part of Kosovo...now he is, oddly enough, dead.

SOMEONE obviously shot the guy...it should be OK for people to consider the options without being accused, insulted, or 'hated' for it.
(No one is real hesitant to make advance judgements where the names Condit or Peterson, or even Simpson (guilty!) are involved...why would this differ?

(otherwise, your comments can be interesting and witty - go with your strong points)