Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pokey78
The article has its good points. But you knew that an article about Bush's "lack of doubt" in the NYTimes was going to paint Bush as a fanatic. There wouldn't be many more lines before we heard that Bush sees the world as a "biblical struggle of good and evil". See, Bush's certainty is an implication of the fact that Bush is a religious fanatic, of course, who wouldn't know a reasonable doubt if it hopped out of his King James Bible and bit him, the Times is telling us.
10 posted on 03/08/2003 1:50:51 PM PST by Timm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Timm
The Times article focuses on Bush's calm and meditation on his decisions, combined with his firm faith. I do not get the sense that this is intended to scare folks into thinking he is some religious fanatic; indeed, it seems intended to do the opposite or it would not focus on the amount of time he thinks about these matters.
14 posted on 03/08/2003 1:58:12 PM PST by rwfromkansas (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Timm
Yeah, and how about that line where the president's aides supposedly have cleared blocs of his time so he can "think," LOL!!! Translating NYT-speak, it means he's being stood in the corner like a bad little boy until he get's his mind "straight" on Iraq. But wasn't it just last week that the president gave a well-received speech to the American Medical Association about medicare? Maybe the NYT wasn't paying attention, because somebody cleared too many blocs of their time!
39 posted on 03/08/2003 5:58:43 PM PST by Wolfstar (Time is not on our side. Let's roll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson