Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Enemy Of The State
For the consumption of NK only.. others ,avert your eyes.
2 posted on
03/08/2003 10:19:40 AM PST by
MEG33
To: Enemy Of The State
Well, if North Korea has more than 100 nuclear weapons, then the US better vaporize that country before it has the chance to use them, should it not?
3 posted on
03/08/2003 10:20:57 AM PST by
TheConservator
(Homines libenter quod volunt credunt--Julius Caesar.)
To: Enemy Of The State
Unlikely. But they do have two or three, or maybe four or five by this time, and delivery vehicles to put them in.
And they'll have 100 in a year or two if we don't take them out.
8 posted on
03/08/2003 10:24:24 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Enemy Of The State
Take your best shot, Kim Jong. We're ready.
9 posted on
03/08/2003 10:24:58 AM PST by
ChadGore
(Next time there's a war in Europe, the loser has to keep France.)
To: Enemy Of The State; knak; maui_hawaii; ALOHA RONNIE; tallhappy; HighRoadToChina
Showing 5,000-mile range for Taipodong II.
August 1998 launch of Taipodong cleared Japan.
If Kim sends his "nukes" to CONUS it'll be in Kia trunks.
As we've heard no PRNK a-tests it's the Twinkies talking.
10 posted on
03/08/2003 10:26:05 AM PST by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: Enemy Of The State
Kim Myong Chul (pictured above) went on to say:"Yea! We have 100, NO!, 200 nuclear weapons! Yea! That's the ticket! And they can hit Bush right on the head! Yea!"
Chul soon left the meeting after declaring: "I have a date with Morgan Fairchild! Yea!"
To: Enemy Of The State
"North Korean missiles can reach any part of the United States of America."Really?!? Why do you keep splashing them into the sea?
Here's a little info for you zipperheads, we have satellites over you, we know where everything is. Now go away and starve for awhile, we will get to you shortly.
To: Enemy Of The State
17 posted on
03/08/2003 10:32:30 AM PST by
TADSLOS
(Sua Sponte)
To: Enemy Of The State; All
North Korean Has More Than 100 Nuclear BombsAs looney tunes as this sounds, remember...we are dealing with 60 year old technology.
Our entrance into the Nuclear Age was in the Slide Rule Era...and those things are bona fide Antiques now.
BTW, I read a book published in the 1960's called "The Day of Trinity", about the test at Alamagordo, New Mexico. The book stated that the ONLY classified part was the 'Initiator'. Anyone with any nuclear physics background can design an 'initiator'.
With what is available today, 100 bombs is looney tunes. But 10 bombs???
I guess that is one legacy of the "kick the can down the road" 1990's, along with the equities implosion, and the rest of the whole unserious zeitgeist.
18 posted on
03/08/2003 10:34:50 AM PST by
Lael
("C'mon, George, lets NOT get wobbly in the legs" - Margaret Thatcher to George the First!)
To: Enemy Of The State
Crunch all you like.
We'll make more.
20 posted on
03/08/2003 10:36:38 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(I have learned, over the years, to NEVER assume ANYTHING..)
To: Enemy Of The State
"But if Bush agrees to talk, Kim Jong Il will accept US-led inspections and the eventual reunification of Korea, which inevitably will lead to a democratic, unified nation. After unification, Kim Jong Il will step down and let the people of Korea elect their national leader..."
That is the best joke today. HAHAHA!!!
To: Enemy Of The State
North Korea: "Give us free stuff or we'll nuke you."
27 posted on
03/08/2003 11:17:21 AM PST by
blam
To: Enemy Of The State
We're not going to waste any time with them. If DPRK commits an act of war, they will simply cease to exist.
28 posted on
03/08/2003 11:21:13 AM PST by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: Enemy Of The State
I'm so sick of hearing about North Korean rhetoric. America needs to just say no to appeasement.
33 posted on
03/08/2003 11:50:59 AM PST by
TBall
To: Enemy Of The State
BRAVO SIERRA
"More than 100" Nice round number.
BS Meter is off the scale.
34 posted on
03/08/2003 12:11:13 PM PST by
TSgt
(“If I do my full duty, the rest will take care of itself.” - General George S. Patton)
To: Enemy Of The State
Great posts, EOTS. Keep kicking them where it hurts. The situation with the ROK is orders of magnitude worse than the pending Sandstorm Fiasco in Iraq and Kuwait.
To: Enemy Of The State
Makes that single flight of ABMs at Greeley woefully short of adequacy. It was designed to stop 5 or so missiles. A large salvo--100 would qualify as large--would make the ABM a mere gesture. The ABM would need to be upgraded to 20 flights to make a difference in a 100 missile attack. Can it be done? Sure, it's just money, which is flowing like water these days. Of course the money won't matter if the missiles are launched, so spend it while you got it.
37 posted on
03/08/2003 12:36:52 PM PST by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
To: Enemy Of The State
With North Korea's missile threat, this will be a great opportunity for Bush to proceed with asking Congress for accelerated funds to develop anti-missile technology. N. Korea's missile threat would then become moot....
40 posted on
03/08/2003 12:56:26 PM PST by
Maringa
To: Enemy Of The State
we can handle 100 bombs going off...if they had, say, 8 million bombs? We would be in trouble. That is, if they are nuclear.
41 posted on
03/08/2003 1:28:30 PM PST by
Vinomori
To: Enemy Of The State
That's not what Sandy Berger says. He says they stopped them from building nukes and NK didn't build them of any significance until Bush came in and screwed everything up.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson