Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sheltonmac
If you had bothered to do some checking you would have found out that President Bush #41 did not mean New World Order in the context this article is written.

He was talking a world where the Berlin War had come down, the Soviet Union broken up, and Saddam out of Kuwait to name a few.

If the author bothered to research he would have found the President's views that have been stated clearly on this debunking this article.
6 posted on 03/05/2003 8:40:05 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PhiKapMom
I heard Bush #41 speak on this issue at a business thingy.

You are exactly right. The New World Order was referencing the changes caused by the end of the Cold War.

Not that you need my backup on anything...;o)

7 posted on 03/05/2003 9:03:49 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (I heart "New" Europe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom
President Bush #41 did not mean New World Order in the context this article is written.

In early January, I listened to a speech (on TV)in the Franklin Hall (either in DC or Philidelphia) by President Bush #41. He made three referrals to the New World Order. None of these could be taken to mean "the Berlin War had come down, the Soviet Union broken up, and Saddam out of Kuwait to name a few."

If I had time I would search back thru all of my posts on FR and find the CNN link for you. I did make a post about his speech and his use of the phrase "New World Order".

36 posted on 03/07/2003 6:43:40 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson