Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: per loin
Huh? Why you bringing race into this?
163 posted on 03/04/2003 1:33:37 PM PST by ArcLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: ArcLight
Why are you not answering my question?
164 posted on 03/04/2003 1:38:49 PM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: ArcLight
Here, from LawyerWare.com, is another specific citing of voodoo, and the statement that its factual impossibility is not a defense:

B. Factual Impossibility
1. Deals with the act.
2. No matter how hard the person tries, the crime can't be committed this way.
Trying to open a safe with a can opener
Using voodoo to kill someone
3. Not a defense.

165 posted on 03/04/2003 2:21:09 PM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: ArcLight
And this from the criminal law course at the Pitt: 1. Defenses to Attempt
1. Impossibility
1. factual impossibility is not a defense b/c D has manifested their dangerousness to society and should be punished
o HYPO - Recent immigrant makes a voodoo doll and should be punished for attempted murder even though it is a factual impossibility b/c when he realizes it won’t work he will try another method b/c he has the necessary intent to kill
167 posted on 03/04/2003 2:33:38 PM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson