Skip to comments.
Driver's license finger scan being considered
wkrn ^
Posted on 03/02/2003 6:52:16 PM PST by chance33_98
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: chance33_98
Good idea.
2
posted on
03/02/2003 6:56:05 PM PST
by
VaBthang4
(Could someone show me one [1] Loserdopian elected to the federal government?)
To: chance33_98
Your papers pleaze!
To: chance33_98
I think we can all show our solidarity with this finger imaging idea by holding our digit aloft in a salute.
To: chance33_98; mykdsmom; billbears; Overtaxed; Darth Reagan; Phantom Lord; Howlin; wimpycat
If the legislation becomes law, Oklahoma would join eight other states with a finger-imaging system: Colorado, Mississippi, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, North Carolina, Texas and West Virginia.Looking at my NCDL, it was last renewed in 3/02.
Last year, I got a duplicate by ordering it online... which obviously did not require my fingerprint.
Is this something new?
If so, I've got a particular finger in mind for them to scan. :)
To: Constitution Day
Hey, I just heard on Fox that the guy they captured yesterday went to A&T!
Whew!
6
posted on
03/02/2003 7:11:16 PM PST
by
Howlin
(q)
To: billorites
The social finger or no?
To: Howlin
"Whew!" indeed. LOL.
I seem to recall that he went to A&T from an earlier FR thread some time ago.
To: VaBthang4
Good idea? I have a finger for them.
9
posted on
03/02/2003 7:15:44 PM PST
by
thepitts
To: VaBthang4
Is this before ,or after they shoot your dog??
To: chance33_98
The borders are open, but the gov't wants our biometric data.
What's wrong with this picture?
11
posted on
03/02/2003 7:16:02 PM PST
by
Mulder
To: chance33_98
If the legislation becomes law, Oklahoma would join eight other states with a finger-imaging system: Colorado, Mississippi, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, North Carolina, Texas and West Virginia.
I live in GA, we don't use touch-print imaging on our driver's licenses. The article is wrong.
12
posted on
03/02/2003 7:18:57 PM PST
by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Lurking since 2000.)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
I live in GA, we don't use touch-print imaging on our driver's licenses. The article is wrong. See my #5... I think it's wrong too. I believe I would have heard of this if we had it.
To: Mulder
To: VaBthang4
Could someone show me one [1] Loserdopian elected to the federal government?Ron Paul, MD
15
posted on
03/02/2003 7:33:05 PM PST
by
AdamSelene235
(Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear.)
To: Constitution Day
At the very least, wouldn't they notify us, give us a warning, and tell us they need to be renewed? Anyway, I think the writer made an error.
16
posted on
03/02/2003 7:34:10 PM PST
by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Lurking since 2000.)
To: chance33_98
Civil liberties issues aside, there is a deeper problem with biometrics.
If a password is hacked you get another password, if an official document is stolen you get another.
If some bright criminal finds a way to fake your fingerprint, you cannot get another. This won't be foolproof and criminals will have an incentive to find a way to defeat it.
Like the CD and DVD and cable anti-copy software, it took how long, a month or two?
Once some creep copies your print or retina scan or whatever, how are you going to prove it is really you with the card? Or that it was not you in Denver the night of the 15th...
17
posted on
03/02/2003 7:36:00 PM PST
by
DBrow
To: AdamSelene235
Paul/Keyes in 2004.
18
posted on
03/02/2003 7:37:27 PM PST
by
Mulder
To: chance33_98
I'm guessing that gov't mandated biometrics will be "the line" for a lot of patriots.
19
posted on
03/02/2003 7:38:06 PM PST
by
Mulder
To: DBrow
This is how they'll get us to participate in being chipped. There is no foolproof ID method. (even chips aren't foolproof, but the sheeple will be desperate and angstful).
Repeat after me...if it can be read...it can be copied. (where it == fingerprints, DNA, retinal scans, anything...)
What the sheeple do when faced with chipping is another matter entirely. (I predict they will simply bend over...'if you have nothing to hide, what's wrong with being chipped?' 'Only chipped people are absolutely free (from suspicion)')
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson