Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(French Lawmakers)Concern Grows Over French-U.S. Relations
AP | 2/27/03 | KIM HOUSEGO

Posted on 02/27/2003 5:21:26 AM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 02/27/2003 5:21:26 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Wow, some frenchlings get it.
2 posted on 02/27/2003 5:23:33 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Some voices of French sanity crawling out from under their truffles.
3 posted on 02/27/2003 5:25:06 AM PST by zarf (Republicans for Sharpton 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
More surrender monkeys. "Up the French!" Who needs them?
4 posted on 02/27/2003 5:30:52 AM PST by ImpBill ("You are either with US or against US!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What I'm hearing here is that the French will not vote to go to war, but won't have the stones to use their veto.

Too bad. I was rather looking forward to a French veto so that we could get a twofer in this war: oust Saddam and destroy the UN.

Now it's looking like in the end French cowardice (too chicken to use their veto) will save the UN after all. Rats.
5 posted on 02/27/2003 5:35:23 AM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
re: Ahead of the debate, an influential pro-American UMP lawmaker Pierre Lellouche told French radio: "We are not going to shoot them (the Americans) in the back." )))

No American is stupid enough to turn his back towards a *frenchman*! We know well the behavior of treacherous, feeble, cowards...

6 posted on 02/27/2003 5:35:35 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"We are not going to break the United Nations and Europe just to save a tyrant"

The tyrant is done regardless of what you do. You're only destroying yourself. Have at it...
7 posted on 02/27/2003 5:40:33 AM PST by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
They've already blown all their amo shooting at us. Who cares how they vote now. It won't change a thing.
8 posted on 02/27/2003 5:44:05 AM PST by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Wow, some frenchlings get it.

Au contraire, they still don't get it at all. But they are not entirely stupid, what they are seing is the consequence of a veto against the U.S. in the upcoming vote at the U. N. Their laundry bill must be skyrocketing lately going through so many pantalettes per day, being on the sh*t list of the U.S. is not something one looks forward to.

9 posted on 02/27/2003 5:52:53 AM PST by quesera (The UN is IRRELEVANT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I saw a great toaster in a catalog and was about to place my order when I saw that it was French made. So, I decided not to order. We can make a difference. I see that some French shops are hurting big time from a lack of business.
10 posted on 02/27/2003 6:23:03 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Maybe the EU should have one vote just like the US has one vote.
11 posted on 02/27/2003 6:30:39 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Opposition Socialist and Communist leaders, however, who stridently oppose war, have repeatedly urged the government to veto any resolution paving the way for military strikes.

The same maggots are the core of Schroeder's support also. But I "disrepect" maggots by making this comparison: THEY eliminate putrification; THESE guys cause it.

12 posted on 02/27/2003 6:39:08 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I think it is too late for the fromage manging cowards who place francs before what is good for the world. France has burnt a bridge with a lot of Americans. I, for one, am again checking labels and will never buy a French product again...
13 posted on 02/27/2003 6:41:23 AM PST by eureka! (France, Germany, Hollywood=Axis of Dishonest Cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"We have taken into account the concern about not uselessly breaking relations with the United States," Barrot also told the paper. "We are not going to get to the point of getting into an argument with Western democracies."

Looks like they're a little late. At this point, they've lost the public relations war here in the US and have again distanced themselves a little farther away. Too little, too late.

14 posted on 02/27/2003 6:45:22 AM PST by The Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
No American is stupid enough to turn his back towards a *frenchman*! We know well the behavior of treacherous, feeble, cowards...

No need to worry. After all, turning your back on a Frenchman means that you will be back-to-back with him as you head towards the battle and he runs from it.

15 posted on 02/27/2003 7:08:07 AM PST by A2J (Those who truly understand peace know that its father is war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I know why the French are beginning to backtrack--they are worried about American economic sanctions that could REALLY put the hurt on the French economy. Airbus Industrie--based in Toulouse in southern France--is the only competitor to Boeing for commercial airplane orders. The thing that scares the French is nearly 40% of parts of an Airbus airliner are sourced from American companies, including the jet engines. If the Americans say non to supplying airplane components to Airbus, Airbus' production line will screech to a halt in less than a week. That would be a economic and political disaster on an unprecedented scale, to say the least.
16 posted on 02/27/2003 7:41:18 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
French cowardice (too chicken to use their veto)

That's how I read it, too. Basically, they may just start surrendering their "principles" soon.

17 posted on 02/27/2003 7:41:39 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
My screen name may not even be appropriate for France. It may be too late for them to kiss and make up...
18 posted on 02/27/2003 7:49:03 AM PST by b4its2late (If we weren't meant to eat animals, how come they're made out of meat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
French cowardice (too chicken to use their veto)

That's how I read it, too. Basically, they may just start surrendering their "principles" soon.

19 posted on 02/27/2003 7:53:20 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Too bad. I was rather looking forward to a French veto so that we could get a twofer in this war: oust Saddam and destroy the UN.

Me, too. The second would be even better than the first!

20 posted on 02/27/2003 10:16:40 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson