First off, I was one of the first posters to say these people should be locked up for life. If you want to say "EVIL", that works fine for me too. I wasn't aware that this was a contest of who could find the best demeaning adjective.
I don't really care at all about "hate speech", so your comment really doesn't mean much to me there.
"You would have credibility if you were first in line demanding harsh punishment for those who abuse others, but that is not your biggest concern, this "propaganda" causes you more concern. "
If you scroll back, you will notice I WAS. I have no sympathy for child molesters.
"Why has this story not been "HEADLINE" news across the nation? "
It may make news in the locales in which these crimes have occurred, but I don't know for sure. Beyond that, there are too many cases of child molestations going on to make a national issue of each one, unfortunately.
"We won't be intimidated with the "HATE SPEECH" threat."
Please don't take this the wrong way, because I mean it sincerely: Good for you. However, I never made a "hate speech threat", so it doesn't apply in this situation.
Also, for the record, just what "method of operations of perverted people" have you seen? Also, what makes you think such operations would apply to all gay people, including me?
You were also the first to say that this "tragedy" was being used for propaganda purposes. I take issue that your choice of word to describe what happened a "tragedy" when what happened was a crime, pre-meditated, not an accident.
You made the comparison of the using the "evil" deed for political gain. The implication that one act was no different than the other.
Method of Operation - Change the subject - homosexuals to heterosexual abuse. Compare race to homosexuals. Then you insult intelligence by saying that this was a propaganda for political gain.
Equate racism and anti-semitism to homosexuality, now after using that comparison claim that you don't care about "hate speech" TWISTED. For what purpose did you choose those words?
I guess without knowing it you made the point that concerns me. "It may make news in locales in which the crimes have occurred" "too many cases of child molestations going on to make a national issue of each one, unfortunately".
Yet when it gets posted here you claim it is being used for propgranda purposes for political gain.
Your own words speak to the method of operation. As I said before I could care less what you choose to do in private. You have not kept "you private" and what I do in private is no one elses business so I have not made the manner in which someone does sex the issue.
So you are gay, what does that have to do with this story. You seem to think that what you choose is relevant to the story and set about making "THAT" the issue not about a "crime wave".