I quoted statistics indicating that although homosexuals were only 2% of the population, they represented 25% of the pedophiles.
Then my opponent quoted statistics indicating that homosexuals were 33% of the population, therefore if they made up 25% of the pedophiles, homosexuals were underrepresented.
At the end, I lost the debate, because I had a hostile audience who believed that homosexuals were actually 33% of the population.
Im just saying the above to caution you about playing the game my dad can beat up your dad or my expert statistician can beat up your expert statistician.
Remember that an American wise man said: There are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies and statistics.
You are among friends here, and I think you are probably correct. Nevertheless, be careful about arguments based solely on statistics.
What nobody ever mentions is the implicit promiscuity of the girls in that type of sample.
Unless of course we assume the extra boys are doing boys or non High School girls.
The more likely answer is the boys are just engaging in bragging and wishful thinking.
I understand why people get upset with militant homosexual activists; what I don't understand is why we have militant homosexual activists.