Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: USConstitution
The huge difference was that the south wanted the common lands (territories) to be enjoyed by all - white and black, while the north wanted the territories to be be lily white.

The south wanted the common lands to be enjoyed by whites and their slaves. The idea that the southern leaders promoted free access by free blacks is ridiculous. All southern states had laws at one time or another prohibiting free blacks from entering the state, some had constitutional clauses limiting the ability to free those slaves that were in the state, and one (Virginia) had a clause in their constitution stating that any slave freed had 12 months to leave the state entirely or else be sold back into slavery.

191 posted on 02/20/2003 8:23:30 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson