Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edsheppa
...and done so without a prejudiced extension of philosophical naturalism

...Why single out that specific religious impulse?

1. Because that is one of the subjectes of this thread.

2. To answer what may be behind your question, we as a culture should in our public schools, inform students of the most significant belief systems of our culture. We should also teach students about how knowledge is reputed to be gained in the various disciplines by those in them and how they interface with each other. That is only being honest and informative, traits which are all too lacking in our schools.

693 posted on 02/19/2003 7:19:53 PM PST by unspun (Christ-informed, American constitutional republic: Yes. Libertarian & objectivist revisionisms: No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 692 | View Replies ]


To: unspun
Because that is one of the subjectes of this thread.

Hmmm. I must have missed the post that advocated a role for philosophical naturalism in the scientific process.

we as a culture should in our public schools, inform students of the most significant belief systems of our culture.

Sure, just not in science class. Let's stick to science there.

We should also teach students about how knowledge is reputed to be gained ...

Reputed? Surely you agree that knowledge has been gained using the methods of science.

the Peter Principle at work in the overextension of the scientific process into realms outside of their domain

Just MO, but I think some of the methods of science can be usefully employed in other domains.

706 posted on 02/19/2003 8:57:50 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson